From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10991: syntax-local-binding does not play well with fluid-let-syntax Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:37:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87r4sovfxm.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87r4sp1bsf.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341603552 17791 80.91.229.3 (6 Jul 2012 19:39:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 19:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10991@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Israelsson Tampe Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 06 21:39:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SnEMw-0003Us-HY for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:39:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38136 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnEMv-0005Kf-IX for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:39:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39929) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnEMs-0005KR-Im for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:39:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnEMp-0002JQ-Hy for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnEMp-0002JD-63 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnERe-00064N-BK for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10991 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10991-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10991.134160378523258 (code B ref 10991); Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10991) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jul 2012 19:43:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53203 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnEQi-000634-FL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:43:05 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:60430 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SnEQf-00062H-6M for 10991@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED537CF89; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 15:38:00 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=a6NRpX+y0IYhWEe7WLMVbhZSIps=; b=bEodfb r016bBojtnZ3+JSjR+sUYM8b72jZ57cEfe5SRpVVcYVCwsyOUDRgJYiZTIDJfYsz F3uBIsYva3SayoLEBpWCjznTaC+W/2nXXgWJoyXbJ9FwcWQPeIVMvXB8oZQqQg2K IpLuaSTgxXOvWMQxwqnU4u2zEozkuyEIbUHuQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=s9Z43crRSobqAoL9M2T0+BGj3lNKvwKB 1p5TGZ7Glk5QmwrNwyFb2n/KEaJbl2BE3Dtarbvx7fhSIp3pihJHBQRDN/TO995i DnaJldGl068efwIuSGZZyJgM0h1Y6lVEkfVqoPW3qCEUIVhRwMlsKQLCKQADtlPV tTNZK+GxOoA= Original-Received: from b-pb-sasl-sd. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4027CF88; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 15:38:00 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [89.131.176.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44736CF86; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 15:38:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of "Fri, 6 Jul 2012 21:03:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1850392A-C7A2-11E1-9F85-FA6787E41631-02397024!b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6420 Archived-At: Hi Stefan, Thanks for looking at this. On Fri 06 Jul 2012 21:03, Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes: > Ok, I'm not using this at the moment so I can wait for master to become > guile-2.2. Even in that case there needs to be an interface to resolve syntax parameters or not, and master doesn't have that yet. So this bug is still a bug even on master. Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/