From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#9769: Misplaced tail call optimization Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:33:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87pqhw9fw7.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87sjmsistv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318840462 25704 80.91.229.12 (17 Oct 2011 08:34:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9769@debbugs.gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 17 10:34:18 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFieI-0003RA-8g for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:34:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38728 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFieH-0003Uq-Qf for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:34:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58751) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFieE-0003UZ-Mz for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFieC-0002lE-Vl for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:34:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52236) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFieC-0002l2-SF for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFif0-0007Ij-7y for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9769 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9769-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9769.131884045027999 (code B ref 9769); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9769) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2011 08:34:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFie9-0007HY-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62] helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFie7-0007HR-Pn for 9769@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:34:09 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282B371EB; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:33:17 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=zmuTFIZ1Fbbxe1SKAYdSOEe9ImQ=; b=HngMjy vFi+CXtjXiwUBPp68N4/f9bpGIwPEKBgjJI6+in1Syou5O42pQwYwNbK0336RgM5 cLp4Y+nHkAexX8PT5YGve75UQQK9w+B//vW1edxxZ64NQDz2E69Eo6+Q/guj3hrX 228S9Nk0ARoLFb0scNZN5D+6NGhb7WzEte8XE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=tFGf+2fpxb2DHLIQU7bg8aE2ddW8oHbj 5L7dO79kE2C2BN3geol307w8jOeHA6/1FTjcUTcXzD/QEfVfgcE6sMck9FH54trG L9N1i1Kjwp8XB2DvoUmlXXS2w4rLMRsaTZozEWxqxhWq6mE62vZb8ajnggR6BKHG YZQT3cNiO0k= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2093871EA; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:33:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9542D71E6; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:33:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87sjmsistv.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:29:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A9253EE6-F89A-11E0-BFED-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:35:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5863 Archived-At: The title of this bug isn't quite right. It's not that Guile is intentionally treating the call to fail as a tail call; it's some bug in the way that "labels allocated" procedures in compile-glil.scm are called. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/