From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#15620: guile 2.0.9 make check error, in bit-operations.test, elisp-compiler.test and eval-string.test Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:24:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87pora2391.fsf@pobox.com> References: <2013101517050250897627@126.com> <87bo2j1wmo.fsf@Kagami.home> <2013102109434970579116@126.com> <87d2mvxpso.fsf@Kagami.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466508389 7050 80.91.229.3 (21 Jun 2016 11:26:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15620@debbugs.gnu.org To: "" Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 21 13:26:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJot-0000gD-Fs for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:26:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50861 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJos-0008T6-42 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:26:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJol-0008So-BC for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:26:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJog-0003s3-BW for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:26:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJog-0003ry-7i for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJog-0007E7-0j for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15620 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guile Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.146650832227723 (code B ref -1); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2016 11:25:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48642 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJo2-0007D5-Kd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:25:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50392) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJo1-0007Cm-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:25:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJnv-0003kt-4p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:25:16 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJnv-0003kn-1k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41357) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJns-0008RY-Ry for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJnn-0003hX-0m for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:59916 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJnm-0003hR-TK for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:25:06 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24DD223F7; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:25:06 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=nq+rZbbM92u7 rssvcVHYv2xpQMM=; b=m+tat2EN2gj+Z/vzdrnHbiOOpSC+SVKd//shA/7VgBYE DmPZxScsgQtsD7GqmIYUnpMqhEuecgCP/xtUeNQnDKhu+heYPagsIfsFBElhsG8L ML+2JP3RZRrLv4TKglIgeBocj56vmjLqv9p0JcdRwtApNJcLVT2rMls26R8se8U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=aNmajh riwcbBLRNEe6CMnbcJMkABx4RfGLqxgbsNCQ9Ri3d8LT3mwq72TrLEB14q0o5iwV aWeuhU2ch1LMVclTGAYPICTEyNIH1iGpkvjjIYnyLE4llYEwSbYU/YKbu6jWzE/j 0Qb4bqD7ol6tagn/Kx+XZft1wFG3DsMuPo5a0= Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3B1223F6; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:25:06 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2C50223F4; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 07:25:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87d2mvxpso.fsf@Kagami.home> (Ian Price's message of "Thu, 24 Oct 2013 05:20:55 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CDEB2DCA-37A2-11E6-AD5B-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8076 Archived-At: Hi Frank, Closing this one due to lack of information. If you find a compile failure with icc on Guile 2.0.11 or 2.1.3, please open a new report. Thanks :) Andy On Thu 24 Oct 2013 06:20, Ian Price writes: > "" writes: > >> Thanks, Ian. >> =C2=A0 >> For me compiling guile is just to satisfy=C2=A0a dependency of another >> software. I am really not=20 >> familiar with guile.=20 >> =C2=A0 >>>(use-modules=C2=A0(ice-9=C2=A0documentation)) >>>(object-documentation=C2=A0extract) >> Do you mean a file in the compiling-folder/module/ice-9? I have no >> idea which one will be.=C2=A0 >> All files in such folder are compressed and attached. Also attached is >> install script and logs. > > I mean, run guile, and enter those two forms at the prompt, followed by > return. Since this is the code in the test that gives an error, you > should hopefully get an error here too. Then you can use the command ,bt > to get a backtrace.