From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#22833: Bug#816123: guile-2.0-libs: guile-procedures.txt is actually port-dependent Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 23:35:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87popkntys.fsf@pobox.com> References: <20160227183824.GA27587@var.home> <87si0dn6xd.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470605801 25853 195.159.176.226 (7 Aug 2016 21:36:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 21:36:41 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) Cc: 22833@debbugs.gnu.org, 816123@bugs.debian.org, 816123-forwarded@bugs.debian.org, Samuel Thibault To: Rob Browning Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 07 23:36:36 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWVk9-00050D-1E for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 23:36:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53939 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWVk5-000076-NI for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:36:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWVjz-00006o-HK for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWVju-0003Dp-K0 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:36:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWVju-0003Dl-Fx for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:36:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWVjm-0002Q0-1j for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 21:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22833 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22833-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22833.14706057189239 (code B ref 22833); Sun, 07 Aug 2016 21:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2016 21:35:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59276 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWVj3-0002Ox-RJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:35:17 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.67]:65178 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWVj2-0002Oq-KS for 22833@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:35:17 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410C3309E6; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:35:16 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=4fuq/A+53Q8EAyMfH0Vv72751w8=; b=ijgj1P rLtGY8g7hv3FZMf2D5flRgIPyWC7I3B0vOxv2T/bnd7ZiaX0MhaNZkTOzlGeiWbs T8W/NF03389upVbPkQ7Ykkt4/S7mqr4cQodEb8dmBbIDe2pxWnfJkSDTAiPku57I F7jbo5o9URKc4mbGFOwMEpfLNqpacC0aABCXg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=szeSQtHnd5eXCcJm4EA2ZpkWlm/CTnRA y0FIcAFFMqJ2VjglDMEEu/RXNmtJpAqXYTU6q3eJqDgiMvr15Bj5TywoidClGKxt 4Eye5ly/QhdwYdhsQkVk6cZY1Waffm75uzCJVTz4AJbmbYALBxP/u6FUDMT6Q352 S5fExDyor3s= Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391CD309E5; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:35:16 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D605309E4; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:35:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87si0dn6xd.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Sat, 27 Feb 2016 16:07:42 -0600") X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D44A9958-5CE6-11E6-B1CD-28A6F1301B6D-02397024!pb-sasl2.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8351 Archived-At: On Sat 27 Feb 2016 23:07, Rob Browning writes: > [If possible, please preserve the 816123-forwarded CC in any replies.] > > Since the content of guile-procedures.txt can vary, perhaps it shouldn't > be in schemelib_DATA. > > cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816123 Confirmed. I guess we could put this in libdir somehow. I wonder if we shouldn't take advantage of the opportunity to do something more sensible and extensible... the easy thing to do would be to just keep doing the same thing though. Andy