From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#30154: [PATCH] web: Add http-patch. Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:13:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87po0ouwbc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180118094310.11658-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <87r2qckxyd.fsf@netris.org> <87o9ldy9j7.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1529323922 28725 195.159.176.226 (18 Jun 2018 12:12:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 12:12:02 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 30154@debbugs.gnu.org To: Arun Isaac Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 18 14:11:58 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fUt0n-0007MG-V9 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 14:11:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34429 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUt2v-0007B9-71 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40799) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUt2p-0007Ap-EX for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUt2o-0006YC-GD for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUt2o-0006Y6-Bt for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fUt2o-0008A3-6Q for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 12:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30154 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 30154-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30154.152932402031329 (code B ref 30154); Mon, 18 Jun 2018 12:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30154) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2018 12:13:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fUt2S-00089D-LC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:13:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49671) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fUt2R-000892-Lv for 30154@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:13:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUt2H-00069c-BC for 30154@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:13:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUt2H-00069U-6r; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:13:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [193.50.110.191] (port=59352 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fUt2G-0003xP-OQ; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:13:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Arun Isaac's message of "Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:03:53 +0530") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:9071 Archived-At: Hello, Arun Isaac skribis: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >>> If you think it's not a good idea to include http-patch in guile, maybe >>> we can export define-http-verb and/or request so that it is easy for >>> users to create their own custom HTTP methods. WDYT? >> >> I would prefer to export the 'request' procedure from (web client), >> although it should probably be exported as a different name, maybe >> 'http-request'. Would that work for you? > > Yes, exporting 'request' alone would serve my purpose, although > 'define-http-verb' would make my script much shorter. But, I'll leave it > to your judgement. Should I send a new patch exporting 'request' alone? Could you do that? The =E2=80=98request=E2=80=99 procedure can simply be m= ade public and otherwise left unchanged, but we=E2=80=99d need a docstring and an entr= y in the manual. Can you take a look? I=E2=80=99ll happily apply the patch afterwards, and I promise you won=E2= =80=99t have to wait as much as you did so far! :-) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.