From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#32501: Bouncing parentheses broken in REPL with vi-mode enabled Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:11:38 -0400 Message-ID: <87pny7bejp.fsf@netris.org> References: <0290e793-0acc-31ed-1d7e-61ed65b9bcf2@gmail.com> <87pny9by7s.fsf@netris.org> <87tvnkcon3.fsf@netris.org> <87mutccn2l.fsf@netris.org> <7e908c7a-4e02-13c4-c09b-78bedc805cf6@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1535152233 3165 195.159.176.226 (24 Aug 2018 23:10:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 23:10:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 32501@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Tam Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 25 01:10:28 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ftLDo-0000Tp-Gt for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:10:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43811 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ftKMB-0004kt-O8 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50227) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ftKLG-00049X-5k for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:14:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ftKLC-0005V9-Lt for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55036) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ftKLC-0005Ux-Gz for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ftKLC-0005XN-6S for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 22:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32501 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32501-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32501.153514880121229 (code B ref 32501); Fri, 24 Aug 2018 22:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32501) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2018 22:13:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60054 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ftKKU-0005WJ-Qj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:13:21 -0400 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:45588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ftKKS-0005W5-9u for 32501@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:13:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ftKKM-000531-DQ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 18:13:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7e908c7a-4e02-13c4-c09b-78bedc805cf6@gmail.com> (Daniel Tam's message of "Fri, 24 Aug 2018 22:42:40 +1000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:9136 Archived-At: Hi Daniel, Daniel Tam writes: > I'm excited to have a look but I have 0 knowledge of the code base (and > am just learning Scheme although that's probably not an issue in this > case whatsoever). It's okay, please don't feel any obligation to work on this. Sometimes people are impatient to fix a problem ASAP, and that's why I wrote these preliminary emails. It's probably better for you to focus on learning Scheme for now, rather than mucking around in the underbelly of an implementation :) I appreciate you taking the time to file this bug report. That's quite useful by itself. Thanks! Mark