From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Christopher Allan Webber Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC? Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:50:01 -0500 Message-ID: <87o9ow830m.fsf__23626.5247724534$1508892679$gmane$org@dustycloud.org> References: <87wp9gwz8m.fsf@gnu.org> <87fug4o8z2.fsf@pobox.com> <87wp54z3p5.fsf@gnu.org> <87zi9th1i6.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87y3o454pr.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2tvncs5.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87wp3mwwef.fsf@gnu.org> <87po9c88rx.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87o9owm9v1.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1508892679 19818 195.159.176.226 (25 Oct 2017 00:51:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:51:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.3.1 Cc: Andy Wingo , 19180@debbugs.gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 25 02:51:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e79uT-0003X9-0S for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 02:51:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46069 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e79ua-0000k9-Gl for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:51:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e79uU-0000jl-3D for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:51:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e79uQ-0005zG-6H for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:51:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e79uQ-0005z1-35 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e79uP-00057i-Pv for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:51:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Christopher Allan Webber Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19180 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19180-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19180.150889260519617 (code B ref 19180); Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19180) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2017 00:50:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60435 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e79tV-00056L-FZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:42240) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e79tU-00056B-3z for 19180@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from oolong (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D922266FE; Tue, 24 Oct 2017 20:50:02 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <87o9owm9v1.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8857 Archived-At: Ludovic Courtès writes: > Christopher Allan Webber skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>> Also, it no longer displays the pathological behavior shown in >>> . >>> >>> Of course, even better if people could test the two patches and confirm >>> that it works for them. >>> >>> Then if there are no objections I’d like to merge them in ‘stable-2.2’. >> >> Sounds great indeed, but it didn't apply to master or stable-2.2 for me? > > Really? The two patches should apply to stable-2.2, though you need to > apply them in the right order (I have it applied over > 80696023620eae12f9b2f167aee834f632a32739.) > > Ludo’. Huh? What object is this? I don't see it in my git repo. This is the latest commit I see to stable-2.2, which is also what Savannah sees: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?h=stable-2.2&id=a74d4ee4f6e062ff640f2532c9cfc9977bb68a49