Even setting aside any security concerns, this caused tests to fail if you ran them as a given user and then ran them again as another user. --- It didn't look like we have anything like mkdtemp or I'd have used it instead. And it looks like this might apply to, and it would be nice to have something like it on stable-2.2 as well. test-suite/tests/00-repl-server.test | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/test-suite/tests/00-repl-server.test b/test-suite/tests/00-repl-server.test index 54f518a66..4324f7371 100644 --- a/test-suite/tests/00-repl-server.test +++ b/test-suite/tests/00-repl-server.test @@ -24,13 +24,25 @@ #:use-module (web request) #:use-module (test-suite lib)) +(define (make-tempdir) + (let loop ((try 0) + (n (random:uniform))) + (let* ((path (string-append "/tmp/repl-server-test-" (number->string n))) + (dir (false-if-exception (mkdir path #o700)))) + (cond + (dir path) + ((> try 10) + (error "Unable to create directory in /tmp for 00-repl-server.test")) + (else (loop (1+ try) (random:uniform))))))) + (define (call-with-repl-server proc) "Set up a REPL server in a separate process and call PROC with a socket connected to that server." - (let ((sockaddr (make-socket-address AF_UNIX "/tmp/repl-server")) - (client-socket (socket AF_UNIX SOCK_STREAM 0))) - (false-if-exception - (delete-file (sockaddr:path sockaddr))) + (let* ((tmpdir (make-tempdir)) + (sockaddr (make-socket-address AF_UNIX (string-append tmpdir "/repl-server"))) + (client-socket (socket AF_UNIX SOCK_STREAM 0))) + (false-if-exception (delete-file (sockaddr:path sockaddr))) + (false-if-exception (rmdir tmpdir)) ;; The REPL server requires thread. The test requires fork. (unless (and (provided? 'threads) (provided? 'fork)) -- 2.24.0
Hi Rob, Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> skribis: > Even setting aside any security concerns, this caused tests to fail if > you ran them as a given user and then ran them again as another user. Oops, indeed. > It didn't look like we have anything like mkdtemp or I'd have used it > instead. And it looks like this might apply to, and it would be nice > to have something like it on stable-2.2 as well. I thought we had ‘mkdtemp!’ but it’s just in Guix. :-/ Well we can go that way for now, perhaps with a FIXME comment suggesting the use of ‘mkdtemp!’ once it’s available. Also please make sure to include a ChangeLog-style commit log. Apart from that it LGTM! I think we should add ‘mkdtemp!’ to libguile in a separate commit; it’s OK to _add_ procedures during a stable release. Thanks, Ludo’.
Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> skribis:
> Even setting aside any security concerns, this caused tests to fail if
> you ran them as a given user and then ran them again as another user.
>
> ---
>
> It didn't look like we have anything like mkdtemp or I'd have used it
> instead. And it looks like this might apply to, and it would be nice
> to have something like it on stable-2.2 as well.
>
> test-suite/tests/00-repl-server.test | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
I believe what you pushed as ddcab06f20525d975503d8d9611e02021fb0dff1
fixes this issue, so I’m closing it now.
Thanks,
Ludo’.