From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: make-glil-local ? Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:03:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87mxyrn48x.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <87eikns71p.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87y6iuq246.fsf@gnu.org> <87fx4l80ay.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87zl2s29ya.fsf@gnu.org> <87bpf8cuih.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87ljebvo3c.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267479933 2254 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2010 21:45:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 21:45:33 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 01 22:45:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmDQe-0008JE-LO for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:45:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41051 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmDQd-0002WS-PY for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:45:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NmDHu-0005Ft-9C for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:36:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33977 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmDHt-0005FS-7H for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:36:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmDHs-0008Fb-PI for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:36:25 -0500 Original-Received: from host24-50-dynamic.24-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it ([79.24.50.24]:51620 helo=ambire.localdomain) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmDHs-0008FR-Ec for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:36:24 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NmCmU-00061m-AQ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:03:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ljebvo3c.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:28:07 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4525 Archived-At: () Neil Jerram () Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:28:07 +0000 I'm sorry, I should have been clearer. "correct" would mean that the bug, and hence the fix needed, is in the code that the warning is pointing to. As opposed to the warning-generation code itself being bugged. OK, that's what i suspected you meant. > Does this mean i'm not being cavalier in the right way? No :-) It means I wasn't clear enough! Thanks for explaining. :-) thi