From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#29194: Fwd: Bug in 2.0.14 Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:19:45 -0500 Message-ID: <87mv3xfllq.fsf@netris.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510114874 17993 195.159.176.226 (8 Nov 2017 04:21:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 04:21:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: 29194@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jason Duerstock Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 08 05:21:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCHrR-0004SC-6H for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 05:21:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57232 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCHrY-0002wI-GP for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:21:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48351) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCHrP-0002vg-Cf for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCHrL-0004ER-D8 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:21:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48724) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCHrL-0004E0-9h for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCHrK-0004eO-Ft for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:21:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 04:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29194 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 29194-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29194.151011481717789 (code B ref 29194); Wed, 08 Nov 2017 04:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29194) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2017 04:20:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57402 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCHqb-0004cr-0V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:20:17 -0500 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:48783) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCHqZ-0004cd-Eb for 29194@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:20:15 -0500 Original-Received: from pool-72-93-31-230.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.93.31.230] helo=jojen) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCHqT-0003iB-Fy; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:20:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Jason Duerstock's message of "Tue, 7 Nov 2017 08:43:18 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8882 Archived-At: merge 29151 29194 thanks Jason Duerstock writes: > I'm trying to restart the Debian ia64 port. In the process, I've hit the attached bug. > > It appears to occur whether I use gcc 4.9 or gcc 7.2. It also seems to appear in 2.0.13. Coincidentally, a Gentoo developer filed a bug for the same issue two days ago, and included a fix, here: https://bugs.gnu.org/29151 Can you try the proposed patch and report back? Thanks, Mark