From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: make-glil-local ? Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:28:07 +0000 Message-ID: <87ljebvo3c.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87eikns71p.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87y6iuq246.fsf@gnu.org> <87fx4l80ay.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87zl2s29ya.fsf@gnu.org> <87bpf8cuih.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267471738 3701 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2010 19:28:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:28:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 01 20:28:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmBIQ-0004ps-5f for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:28:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45851 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmBIP-0005o4-Ec for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:28:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NmBIE-0005d1-DE for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:28:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59806 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmBIC-0005c7-E9 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:28:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmBI9-0003QB-U7 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:28:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:45990) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmBI9-0003Q7-PY for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:28:33 -0500 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-182-154-126.range86-182.btcentralplus.com [86.182.154.126]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB091F6A0D; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:28:33 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from arudy (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FFE38026; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:28:07 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <87bpf8cuih.fsf@ambire.localdomain> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:32:06 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4524 Archived-At: Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > () ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) > () Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:54:05 +0100 > > > Is the warning correct? > > Of course it is! :-) > > I don't understand the question or the answer. > (That is, what does "correct" mean?) I'm sorry, I should have been clearer. "correct" would mean that the bug, and hence the fix needed, is in the code that the warning is pointing to. As opposed to the warning-generation code itself being bugged. > Does this mean i'm not being cavalier in the right way? No :-) It means I wasn't clear enough! Neil