From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:49:06 -0500 Message-ID: <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328061051 31473 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2012 01:50:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 01:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= To: Hans Aberg Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 02:50:50 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPLV-0000Hf-CN for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:50:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58019 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPLU-0007Su-L4 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPLR-0007Sp-BM for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPLQ-0003Io-0X for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:45 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPLP-0003Ik-Tz for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPLi-0004ud-2I for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132806103518848 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 01:50:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47877 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPLG-0004tx-St for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:35 -0500 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:37567 ident=hope1) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPLE-0004tp-Lz for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:33 -0500 Original-Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsPKr-0005Rz-HZ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:50:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:34:18 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6137 Archived-At: Hans Aberg writes: > After doing this, the same failure with the LLVM-GCC compiler: > /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 > /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 > i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 > > This is the compiler that one will use on OS X 10.7 if one installs > Xcode 4.2.1, and is not setting the compiler explicitly (or overriding > by another install). > > Hans > > > PASS: test-asmobs > bad return from expression `(f-sum -1 2000 -30000 40000000000)': expected 39999971999; got 39999972255 > FAIL: test-ffi Are you sure this guile was linked against your newly-built 'libffi'? Your previously reported results (using GCC 4.7.0 from SVN) seemed to suggest a bug in an earlier version of 'libffi' that has since been fixed in their development tree. Mark