jakub-w@riseup.net writes:

> You're right but you didn't address my second point.
> The fact that with this patch
>
> (call-with-input-string "HTTP/1.1 \n"
>   (lambda (port) (read-response-line port)))

I see, my bad, thanks! Please find a newly attached patch.

I added a test for such a case, but I am not sure about the indentation
though. Please let me know what you think.

-- 
Alexey