From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Guile 2.0.1: scm_init_guile() broken on Mac OS X 10.6.7 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:26:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87k4ck95b8.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87aafb2w68.fsf@gnu.org> <0050B2E9-CAF4-4204-A3F7-298DE26F79D9@telia.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308329829 6598 80.91.229.12 (17 Jun 2011 16:57:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile bug To: Hans Aberg Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 17 18:57:05 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXcLv-0004Zl-Kd for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:57:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52056 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXcLu-00010g-E7 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57535) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXafg-000334-Q7 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:09:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXafe-0008SM-Pg for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:09:20 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:57409 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXafe-0008LJ-ES for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:09:18 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA375F50; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:11:03 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=nRz8Lh05ump+RDBVVGke+ZpUSHs=; b=JBxxBD 00BHNxMcnek3rWMLc4sWmsx1bNfNBHhb+AuK+o+uOYns8sJ4KKQpG9t+kZPMiFTn sibVMcRH5Mui8TxLKKExquByJyrhCi2i+HHTbqiMLUEMcc23JE43tjM/SDuY7gP8 sfFDUN6C/1xBvGLY7frE7viA5Ovs7pufnZ08A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=NSFNl0odUGRFSx9l9pFKwUfjeSs8KHbr 6W1iwwJ8uDJ+lJE5ur269LMeXEc8b7/6IKJhsij4Zl921WU9M4FZ3TSIt5/KRGpL Jm5HkWj3yvUxzTk1s/W+gpXhqJwRKxh5+Y1m+td8uSUQkiqAdgA3FKM4Br0ch3D9 IxUdR2iOb1U= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A795F4F; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:11:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 234825F4E; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:11:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <0050B2E9-CAF4-4204-A3F7-298DE26F79D9@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Sat, 21 May 2011 19:20:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 044F4494-98F4-11E0-A08A-5875C023C68D-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5654 Archived-At: On Sat 21 May 2011 19:20, Hans Aberg writes: > On 20 May 2011, at 12:11, Andy Wingo wrote: > >>> On Mac OS X 10.6.7, compiled using Xcode Version 3.2.6 64-bit, >>> i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1, scm_init_guile() gives the >>> error: >>> >>> Failed to get stack base for current thread. > >> As you can see we rely on libgc here, and so this is a libgc bug. Can >> you try a newer libgc, or if that still fails, bring it up on their >> list? > > One must take down the CVS version, and building with threads say by using > ./configure --enable-threads=posix && make Thank you for tracking this down. There should be a new libgc snapshot very shortly. (One would hope for an actual 7.2 release, but hey.) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/