From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10974: guile-user@gnu.org Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:09:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87ipe5s1u0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wr2mv6y4.fsf@gnu.org> <87vci5rg54.fsf@pobox.com> <871uktu6z2.fsf@gnu.org> <87a9zhrbvh.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341303040 18271 80.91.229.3 (3 Jul 2012 08:10:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10974@debbugs.gnu.org, Alexei Matveev To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 03 10:10:39 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SlyBy-00048a-AZ for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:10:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38396 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlyBx-0001oX-3j for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 04:10:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50539) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlyBp-0001o7-8y for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 04:10:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlyBj-0007KD-1J for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 04:10:28 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlyBi-0007Jv-UN for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 04:10:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SlyGE-0007xW-GU for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 04:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10974 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10974-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10974.134130325230529 (code B ref 10974); Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10974) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2012 08:14:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44228 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SlyFP-0007wM-Vr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 04:14:12 -0400 Original-Received: from xanadu.aquilenet.fr ([88.191.123.111]:39393) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SlyFN-0007wE-VO for 10974@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 04:14:11 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xanadu.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874F87E89; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:09:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from xanadu.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xanadu.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T1xZJuUOVVXy; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:09:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from pluto (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) by xanadu.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEE161C69; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:09:28 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 Messidor an 220 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <87a9zhrbvh.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:17:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6378 Archived-At: Hi, Andy Wingo skribis: > On Tue 03 Jul 2012 00:35, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Andy Wingo skribis: >> >>> Would this be "fixed" if we changed these to be implemented as inline >>> functions? >> >> In some way, though their address could still not be taken. > > Sorry to be obtuse, but with our inline functions, we also residualize a > concrete instantiation (via the inline.c madness). Does that not work? Yes, right, so we could just inline them all. Ludo=E2=80=99.