From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: inexact integers in modulo etc Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:12:50 -0500 Sender: bug-guile-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87hem3q0t9.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <200204151232.FAA21621@cmn14.stanford.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019484929 26892 127.0.0.1 (22 Apr 2002 14:15:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16zebI-0006zd-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:15:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zeb7-0000SA-00; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:15:17 -0400 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zeYm-0000Jr-00 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:12:52 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8321182; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:12:51 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D2016B67; Mon, 22 Apr 2002 09:12:50 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: Bill Schottstaedt In-Reply-To: <200204151232.FAA21621@cmn14.stanford.edu> (Bill Schottstaedt's message of "Mon, 15 Apr 2002 05:32:27 -0700") Original-Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: bug-guile-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:163 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:163 Bill Schottstaedt writes: > I guess this is not news, but just in case... Some Guile numerical > primitives that should (could?) accept inexact integers (at least > that's the way I read r5rs) do not. The remainder example below is > taken from r5rs: I'll add these to the list as I look back over numbers.c -- I've been integrating GMP support, starting with our bignums, and I've already fixed some similar issues (maybe these as well?). I've filed your message as workbook/bugs/numbers-gmp-conversion. I'll add other bits to it as appropriate. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile