From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: problem about v1.8.0 guile Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:25:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87hbdc1j5e.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294961141 9661 80.91.229.12 (13 Jan 2011 23:25:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: joe Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 14 00:25:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PdWXw-0001oj-Qd for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:25:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46063 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdWXw-0008JD-5u for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:25:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51323 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdWXT-00086r-Bp for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:25:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdWXS-0007Cy-C5 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:25:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:59640) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PdWXS-0007Cj-6Q for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:25:06 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,319,1291590000"; d="scan'208";a="95235883" Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO nixey) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 14 Jan 2011 00:25:04 +0100 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 25 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Niv=F4se?= an 219 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (joe's message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:47:53 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4950 Archived-At: Hi, joe writes: > Recently, we migrate scheme codes from v1.6.4 guile to v1.8.0 guile > and go to build. I warmly recommend 1.8.8, the latest release of the 1.8 series. > But, we get error message as below : > ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: > ERROR: Unable to find file > "../../sid1/opcodes/../cgen/cgen-opc.scm" in load path Dot-dot should be avoided in file names passed to =E2=80=98primitive-load-p= ath=E2=80=99, since that procedure searches for the given file in =E2=80=98%load-path=E2= =80=99 (info "(guile) Loading"). > 1. is there any change about file loading from v1.6.4 guile to v1.8= .0 > guile? I don=E2=80=99t think so, but these are two very old releases. > 2. could you give me suggestion of how to debug guile or debug sche= me > codes? For the problem at hand, you could try the =E2=80=98search-path=E2=80=99 pr= ocedure to see what happens, or use strace(1) to see where Guile is looking for this file. Hope this helps, Ludo=E2=80=99.