From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:13:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87hbbvawim.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201102191507.50333.bruno@clisp.org> <201102202350.16563.bruno@clisp.org> <878vx7bxw3.fsf@gnu.org> <201102222240.02713.bruno@clisp.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298456050 7283 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2011 10:14:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Bruno Haible Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 23 11:14:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PsBjQ-0008Kj-To for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:14:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40878 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsBjQ-000675-AP for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:14:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44909 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsBjI-00064V-Mx for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:13:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsBjH-0006af-CR for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:13:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:45574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsBjH-0006aT-5o for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:13:55 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.62,211,1297033200"; d="scan'208";a="100475969" Original-Received: from unknown (HELO nixey) ([193.50.110.208]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 23 Feb 2011 11:13:54 +0100 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 5 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vent=F4se?= an 219 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <201102222240.02713.bruno@clisp.org> (Bruno Haible's message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:40:01 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 192.134.164.82 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5224 Archived-At: Hi Bruno, Bruno Haible writes: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> However, why do you have -Wall in CPPFLAGS, instead of CFLAGS, in the >> first place? :-) > > Because CPPFLAGS=3D-Wall is shorter to type than CFLAGS=3D"-g -O2 -Wall", > and I know that -Wall has no effect when linking a program or library. Sure, but it=E2=80=99s not a cpp flag, right? What I mean is that we won=E2=80=99t prevent you from shooting yourself in = the foot. ;-) I only ever use CPPFLAGS for -I flags and can=E2=80=99t think of other like= ly uses. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.