From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10621: Incorrect usage of hash procedures in (ice-9 mapping) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:10:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87hal1g5v6.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87k44do8lw.fsf@netris.org> <87pq2x201w.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361715096 13331 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2013 14:11:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10621-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Hartwig Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 24 15:11:59 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9cJ1-0008O3-LS for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:11:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39774 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9cIh-0001XQ-0r for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:11:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9cIc-0001XG-Tn for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:11:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9cIb-0001mR-DP for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:11:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41422) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9cIb-0001m9-6c for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:11:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9cK6-0004G3-DG for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:13:02 -0500 Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 10621 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 10621@debbugs.gnu.org, wingo@pobox.com, mhw@netris.org Original-Received: via spool by 10621-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D10621.136171512216278 (code D ref 10621); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10621-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2013 14:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46885 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9cJ7-0004EQ-9r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:12:01 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:41557 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9cJ4-0004EI-Oy for 10621-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:11:59 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52145AC89; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:10:24 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=yLTQigAxUoymxXRYYyrS6WzL0mk=; b=RullBN RyilWLJKStc55oG+JChxGGQR1jvWe2AevOuLJBLaM3o5Zk5A3Jtk2XrUgYCBMc7h Z4JeC6vUaiQZ74ITkIB5Bd9XSYrpgz3HTzl9X2cHsBhxW1adw6K6Qc3U6AHJ8CRh tjB9dGmMFZMyo9aWSX03SJDYejGM5Im7+cJjg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=WZEKFm4R7LpobooPuV6wgASa6qdsUF8V bvqiibi5UBlwzR6DuyJl1vVQLwhbbiTp3foXi+z8tulDLalLi8rJKOlj3Wz+7bW7 0mBJQHYlkpAZ2n4GSs4P5oQeUbpQuqIV6HP9bacEz6Mu042Uy2QNRIhOrMjYfbdq yMBjAgvZWz4= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48251AC88; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:10:24 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C70EBAC87; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:10:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87pq2x201w.fsf@gmail.com> (Daniel Hartwig's message of "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:56:43 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EE608CF4-7E8B-11E2-B120-1C2F0E5B5709-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6773 Archived-At: On Wed 28 Nov 2012 16:56, Daniel Hartwig writes: > A short module, it is not hard to fix, though given all of the above it > makes sense to simply remove it. I think removing it is the right thing. Even with your patch it still won't work because the default "table constructor" is a vector instead of a hash table. Regardless of whether it were new or old, I would much prefer to remove this module than to document it properly, especially given the existence of alternatives like srfi-69 and rnrs hash tables as you mention. I will apply your patch (so that the compile warnings go away), add a deprecation notice, and remove the module in master. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/