From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#24342: Typo in manual? Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:13:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87h99yiust.fsf@pobox.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472804066 4378 195.159.176.226 (2 Sep 2016 08:14:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 08:14:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) Cc: 24342-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Wilfred Hughes Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 02 10:14:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfjcB-0000PR-1k for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:14:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40864 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfjc8-00016f-P8 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 04:14:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfjc2-00015m-8r for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 04:14:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfjbu-0006Rg-KY for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 04:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfjbu-0006RW-EY for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 04:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfjbu-00072y-Ak for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 04:14:02 -0400 Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 08:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 24342 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 24342@debbugs.gnu.org, wingo@pobox.com, me@wilfred.me.uk Original-Received: via spool by 24342-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D24342.147280399727021 (code D ref 24342); Fri, 02 Sep 2016 08:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24342-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2016 08:13:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfjbB-00071l-4e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 04:13:17 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:53155 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfjb9-00071d-PZ for 24342-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 04:13:16 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706E437D8C; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 04:13:14 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Yy4wxwlcS93UiSwwRee3r6DuC/M=; b=NolQz4 gWqttN6W157VFd/dlc70UrrwYGDrg1BfgAA/FbEBeQ5f/2sdNCmuttir0kebx2S0 9kN+7qsCwNqPiE44Y0GP2OOVbBMWSzle7XCao6VOQ8kwourR3dY2YHfdN+NVKd5O YFll19++3GW5JM1K0EiZJWOWYUSoqRPuZuNmc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Z9hEQ4Ji5g37+skefOqyHp9pj6AobkiM Nf0f5dSqxUkiAMs6ClDJnViaiP8+ih12/QpV8jo9Gvdb1An4AkBvEi0zW94SyBio AjQMeAJSD70KwgtOMTtnoF5K2kjz1e5DawJhsWREbI4kU3IGkIHp3xu0PFS1YA7y dDg+Yas6sv8= Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5704937D8B; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 04:13:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6489037D88; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 04:13:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Wilfred Hughes's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:28:52 -0400") X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1830A538-70E5-11E6-99DB-CE686462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8397 Archived-At: On Wed 31 Aug 2016 06:28, Wilfred Hughes writes: > I was reading > https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Nil.html#Nil and > noticed that the last code section uses deffn. > > Is this correct? Since it's intended to be an elisp function, > shouldn't it be 'defun'? I think it's a typo, texinfo uses @deffn to define functions, probably just a thinko. Fixed, tx :) Andy