From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#32160: auto compile fails to recompile when included source files change Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:34:40 -0400 Message-ID: <87h8kbwgrj.fsf@netris.org> References: <87muu4ve9y.fsf@netris.org> <20180802200226.GA12552@tuxteam.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533314253 7003 195.159.176.226 (3 Aug 2018 16:37:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 16:37:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 32160@debbugs.gnu.org To: Arun Isaac Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 03 18:37:28 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fld4y-0001jF-LB for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 18:37:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52257 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fld75-0006GM-Ax for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:39:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fld4b-0004RV-PD for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fld4Y-0006Z4-LX for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:37:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35108) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fld4Y-0006Yj-Gw for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fld4Y-0007R5-7m for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 16:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32160 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32160-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32160.153331417828521 (code B ref 32160); Fri, 03 Aug 2018 16:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32160) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2018 16:36:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40126 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fld3p-0007Px-OP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:36:17 -0400 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:56626) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fld3o-0007Pl-D2 for 32160@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fld3f-000071-4y; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:36:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Arun Isaac's message of "Fri, 03 Aug 2018 14:04:48 +0530") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:9107 Archived-At: Hi Arun, Arun Isaac writes: >>> If you'd like to investigate further, I'd be glad to give you >>> pointers and advice, but it's not a project for the faint-hearted :-/ > > I am faint-hearted and do not wish to pursue this further. :-P I just > thought it might be useful to report. Should I close this bug report, or > leave it open for someone to fix in the future? I'd prefer to leave it open, because it is indeed an important issue that would be good to fix eventually. Thanks! Mark