From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review Date: 07 May 2002 21:39:17 +0200 Sender: bug-guile-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87g013kasa.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87bsbrls99.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020800546 15439 127.0.0.1 (7 May 2002 19:42:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 19:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Rob Browning , Guile Bugs Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 175Aqw-00040u-00 for ; Tue, 07 May 2002 21:42:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 175Aqk-0006od-00; Tue, 07 May 2002 15:42:14 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip59.dokom.de ([195.138.42.59] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 175Anu-0006Kq-00 for ; Tue, 07 May 2002 15:39:18 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 3785 invoked by uid 1000); 7 May 2002 19:39:17 -0000 Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: bug-guile-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:224 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:224 Neil Jerram writes: > OK. Any thoughts on whether this is worth putting into the stable > branch as well? I assume it's Rob's decision... If I understand the issue right (which I probably don't), the lossage only occurs together with 'local-eval', right? If that is the case, my opinion would be that it is not worth fixing it in 'stable' and risking new obscure bugs. _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile