From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: [PATCH] Declare `GC_dump' ourselves if doesn't. Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:51:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87fx6cdiyf.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <87zl4nmmpl.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <878wc45m5w.fsf@gnu.org> <874oms5l2e.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263277733 27293 80.91.229.12 (12 Jan 2010 06:28:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:28:53 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 12 07:28:46 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NUaFB-0008ME-M5 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:28:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36811 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUaFC-0005AF-An for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:28:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUaF4-00059x-UV for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:28:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUaF2-00059l-Te for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:28:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43726 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUaF2-00059i-OU for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:28:36 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out113.alice.it ([85.37.17.113]:1881) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUaF2-0000gA-CH for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:28:36 -0500 Original-Received: from FBCMMO02.fbc.local ([192.168.68.196]) by smtp-out113.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:28:34 +0100 Original-Received: from FBCMCL01B09.fbc.local ([192.168.171.26]) by FBCMMO02.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:28:34 +0100 Original-Received: from ambire.localdomain ([79.21.69.11]) by FBCMCL01B09.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:28:34 +0100 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NUaCd-0001iy-Fa for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:26:07 +0100 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2010 06:28:34.0518 (UTC) FILETIME=[77825F60:01CA9350] X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4446 Archived-At: () ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) () Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:32:57 +0100 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Guile doesn=E2=80=99t requires 7.x (the =E2=80=98README=E2=80=99 file = says so.) I meant =E2=80=9CGuile requires 7.x=E2=80=9D. Hmm, requiring versions is not the Autoconf Way. What feature / interface elements of libgc 7.x could we use in the configure script to check for it? If someone would tell me this (or point me towards a 6 vs 7 comparison relevant to Guile), i will prepare a new patch. thi