* make-glil-local ?
@ 2010-02-14 23:59 Thien-Thi Nguyen
2010-02-15 9:28 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen @ 2010-02-14 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bug-guile
There was a warning in about possibly undefined `make-glil-local'
in module/language/glil/decompile-assembly.scm and indeed i can't
find that symbol anywhere...
(This is from a "make clean ; make", but i unfortunately deleted
the *Compilation* buffer.)
thi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: make-glil-local ?
2010-02-14 23:59 make-glil-local ? Thien-Thi Nguyen
@ 2010-02-15 9:28 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-02-28 22:25 ` Neil Jerram
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2010-02-15 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bug-guile
Hi,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org> writes:
> There was a warning in about possibly undefined `make-glil-local'
> in module/language/glil/decompile-assembly.scm and indeed i can't
> find that symbol anywhere...
Yes, we all see these warnings. The idea is that someday someone will
be annoyed and will fix it. :-)
Seriously I’d like such things to be fixed by 2.0. Patches welcome!
Thanks,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: make-glil-local ?
2010-02-15 9:28 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2010-02-28 22:25 ` Neil Jerram
2010-02-28 23:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Neil Jerram @ 2010-02-28 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: bug-guile
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org> writes:
>
>> There was a warning in about possibly undefined `make-glil-local'
>> in module/language/glil/decompile-assembly.scm and indeed i can't
>> find that symbol anywhere...
>
> Yes, we all see these warnings. The idea is that someday someone will
> be annoyed and will fix it. :-)
Is the warning correct?
Neil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: make-glil-local ?
2010-02-28 22:25 ` Neil Jerram
@ 2010-02-28 23:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-03-01 8:32 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2010-02-28 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Jerram; +Cc: bug-guile
Hi,
Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org> writes:
>>
>>> There was a warning in about possibly undefined `make-glil-local'
>>> in module/language/glil/decompile-assembly.scm and indeed i can't
>>> find that symbol anywhere...
>>
>> Yes, we all see these warnings. The idea is that someday someone will
>> be annoyed and will fix it. :-)
>
> Is the warning correct?
Of course it is! :-)
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: make-glil-local ?
2010-02-28 23:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2010-03-01 8:32 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2010-03-01 19:28 ` Neil Jerram
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen @ 2010-03-01 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bug-guile
() ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:54:05 +0100
> Is the warning correct?
Of course it is! :-)
I don't understand the question or the answer.
(That is, what does "correct" mean?)
Does this mean i'm not being cavalier in the right way?
thi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: make-glil-local ?
2010-03-01 8:32 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
@ 2010-03-01 19:28 ` Neil Jerram
2010-03-01 21:03 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Neil Jerram @ 2010-03-01 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thien-Thi Nguyen; +Cc: bug-guile
Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org> writes:
> () ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> () Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:54:05 +0100
>
> > Is the warning correct?
>
> Of course it is! :-)
>
> I don't understand the question or the answer.
> (That is, what does "correct" mean?)
I'm sorry, I should have been clearer. "correct" would mean that the
bug, and hence the fix needed, is in the code that the warning is
pointing to. As opposed to the warning-generation code itself being
bugged.
> Does this mean i'm not being cavalier in the right way?
No :-) It means I wasn't clear enough!
Neil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: make-glil-local ?
2010-03-01 19:28 ` Neil Jerram
@ 2010-03-01 21:03 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen @ 2010-03-01 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bug-guile
() Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net>
() Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:28:07 +0000
I'm sorry, I should have been clearer. "correct" would mean
that the bug, and hence the fix needed, is in the code that the
warning is pointing to. As opposed to the warning-generation
code itself being bugged.
OK, that's what i suspected you meant.
> Does this mean i'm not being cavalier in the right way?
No :-) It means I wasn't clear enough!
Thanks for explaining. :-)
thi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-01 21:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-14 23:59 make-glil-local ? Thien-Thi Nguyen
2010-02-15 9:28 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-02-28 22:25 ` Neil Jerram
2010-02-28 23:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
2010-03-01 8:32 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2010-03-01 19:28 ` Neil Jerram
2010-03-01 21:03 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).