From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#9776: case-lambda should accept zero clauses Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:06:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87fwftu7lt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ty77c4ab.fsf@weinholt.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325801265 3083 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2012 22:07:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9776@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B6ran?= Weinholt Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 05 23:07:37 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RivTC-0002WB-Ii for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:07:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45870 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RivTC-0000hj-0w for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:07:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47769) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RivT9-0000he-Pf for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:07:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RivT8-0005mz-GR for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:07:31 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RivT8-0005mv-BP for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:07:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RivWY-0006Q9-7r for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9776 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9776-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9776.132580143424646 (code B ref 9776); Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9776) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2012 22:10:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RivW5-0006PS-ES for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:10:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RivW1-0006PJ-Uf for 9776@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:10:31 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,464,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="138048127" Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO pluto) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 05 Jan 2012 23:06:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ty77c4ab.fsf@weinholt.se> ("=?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B6ran?= Weinholt"'s message of "Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:15:40 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 =?UTF-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 220 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:11:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6023 Archived-At: Hi G=C3=B6ran, Sorry for the delay. G=C3=B6ran Weinholt skribis: > the case-lambda form is specified in r6rs-lib as accepting any number of > clauses, including zero. So this should not give an error: My interpretation of the =E2=80=98case-lambda=E2=80=99 implementation on p.= 15 of r6rs-lib.pdf is that =E2=80=98case-lambda-help=E2=80=99 raises an assertion= violation when =E2=80=98case-lambda=E2=80=99 is called with zero clauses. The text itself doesn=E2=80=99t explicitly mention that zero clauses are supported. What makes you think otherwise? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.