From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#9973: Inconsistent documentation of repeated arguments Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:20:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87fw03uhuq.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87obwpawy1.fsf@goof.bjgalaxy> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362946877 17541 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2013 20:21:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9973-close@debbugs.gnu.org To: b3timmons@speedymail.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 10 21:21:41 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UEmkV-000493-SR for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:21:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60143 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEmk9-00038e-Np for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:21:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEmk5-000380-Mw for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:21:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEmk4-0007Av-6K for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:21:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEmk4-0007An-2z for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UEmks-0005fm-6c for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:22:02 -0400 Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 9973 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 9973@debbugs.gnu.org, wingo@pobox.com, b3timmons@speedymail.org Original-Received: via spool by 9973-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D9973.136294690521777 (code D ref 9973); Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9973-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2013 20:21:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44441 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UEmka-0005fA-HC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:21:45 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:59758 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UEmkV-0005f1-EP for 9973-close@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:21:43 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05C3BD05; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:20:48 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=MVYYgkPxhmLkOsv6oy6Z7kD8h2g=; b=bmJiwM gUvDM0p8Vd47G4atrZuSotCkQ2NS3WQUNdsoGGFjZ0C2oQLmU7gvSeyiHIbYwvqr MFEP4UBrtlyZtKA7+bUJ5p9RsFvycnDoShBJ1qSyPbLe1S+MhTY1NW+jEOhiUlcZ e2VDE0n2lqnCkb8wzImEXbACtWdTeNaTm+jAo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ijn0+YbaD5CUG8fz68IG2hrQBLgj7pXV IhngvNM+1QUMbb/5LP5HShdRanItO6dXPAJfKXeT8Csj3M4Xjh1IWE2Dq7ChYTBF JFm1Ywpv+FDvJOID0zE35mn4bM/k3ZZql+LARHg8KgKDRZbPtAY+OWq7qEvzY211 sMYmJpKNSC4= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EB5BD04; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:20:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 686C8BD00; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:20:48 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87obwpawy1.fsf@goof.bjgalaxy> (42toes@gmail.com's message of "Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:10:46 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FF1021B0-89BF-11E2-B0DB-59240E5B5709-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6927 Archived-At: On Sun 06 Nov 2011 20:10, 42toes@gmail.com writes: > Why not tighten up notation in the docs as well as in the language? > (4) -- Scheme Procedure: error who message irritant1 ... > > IMO, (4) is the right thing. I just checked and I think we are OK (only simple-format has ". args", and that only to be consistent with the following C prototype) -- thanks to your patches, also. Please submit a new patch if you find more instances of foo . bar in prototypes. Cheers :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/