From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: sleep 999 after tests Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:50:46 +1000 Message-ID: <87eji0pct5.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <4656F9EA.4090300@phys.uu.nl> <87k5rvgjna.fsf@zip.com.au> <46C55859.5020108@gentoo.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187484665 19775 80.91.229.12 (19 Aug 2007 00:51:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 00:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: hkBst@gentoo.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 19 02:51:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IMZ0Q-0002Ie-AU for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 02:51:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IMZ0S-0006Dr-4E for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:51:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IMZ0N-0006CX-Tm for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:50:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IMZ0M-0006Bj-8Y for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:50:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IMZ0M-0006Bg-6A for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:50:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout1-1.pacific.net.au ([61.8.2.208] helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IMZ0I-0001sB-TB for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:50:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.163]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978DB395C6B; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:50:48 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2946.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.41.70]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BAB2740F; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:50:48 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IMZ0A-0002jl-Mc; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:50:46 +1000 In-Reply-To: <46C55859.5020108@gentoo.org> (Marijn Schouten's message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:12:09 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3572 Archived-At: "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" writes: > > This test depends on networking being enabled. Does it? It's a pipe, not a socket. > So how about making it 30 seconds? No, but something that made the two processes watch more closely what each other is doing would be fine. (I suppose the child process ought to be killed+waited explicitly too.) As I said though, if it's blocking for 999 then you're looking at a bug, maybe in guile, maybe in the test. _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile