From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#20209: GUILE 2.0.11: crash in set_port_filename_x for bytevector ports Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:01:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87eg7nn5sk.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87fv8r1pio.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87egob8irs.fsf@netris.org> <87y4mhasqb.fsf@netris.org> <87twx40x7c.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3bnn9tq.fsf@pobox.com> <87shw3et9j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466705528 3395 80.91.229.3 (23 Jun 2016 18:12:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 20209@debbugs.gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 23 20:11:54 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bG96U-0006Hm-Jc for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:11:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38544 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG96T-0001du-MD for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:11:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG8x3-0007IL-V4 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:02:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG8x0-0008Dq-P5 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:02:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40621) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bG8x0-0008Dk-LC for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG8x0-00025Y-F3 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20209 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20209-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20209.14667048867982 (code B ref 20209); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20209) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 18:01:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52958 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG8wQ-00024g-4W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:01:26 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.67]:57695 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bG8wN-00024X-Jn for 20209@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:01:25 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBB925471; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:01:23 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=pNwI6kcOS8NF5tj1iKa69aahIGo=; b=nI6nUo HeeZhnjMliDj+e8cQEbYEk8fRDTyJF/TpsVcTSdpD1873MMnPAzu2PspJRXVUrXL wOYpxhtQZAm7yCsLum0PH13TtmWAO1PuoSg27CtSEW8+2apGbQhuZVoTP+U3yIED GSJzmU4CW2Llb0iVLlq+BeNI6bm/DKAle63PU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=e4XzOh1HPsqgRnCUBpcHinO8IJ22hjU7 nEPRFuTtYI5XiCPzrQ8nz59sJelcWl825wXZRplbf2hir7m2ZqSKyC2ZxE1aza8m llyjxWdx4Z8WPuOQCUheWXgAQv9GxsXtE5c2/JuFAcqpDX6Jpp6f8RGyb1tWLmd9 G1uQFFA7pZ4= Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EA42546F; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:01:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 607AF2546A; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:01:22 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87shw3et9j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:59:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7EBA9CA6-396C-11E6-92D3-28A6F1301B6D-02397024!pb-sasl2.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8177 Archived-At: On Thu 23 Jun 2016 18:59, David Kastrup writes: > I don't see anything protecting sym_big or sym_little (more accurately, > 'big or 'little which are non-immediate SCM values) from collection > which would make sym_big and sym_little useless for comparison. > > I'm assuming that not the whole bss segment is getting scanned by > BoehmGC. The whole bss segment is scanned by the GC :) See the third paragraph here. https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/master/guile.html/Garbage-Collection.html#Garbage-Collection This section applies to 2.0 as well. Andy