From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#22141: guile-2.1.1 fails with error 134 in ice-9/psyntax-pp.go on cygwin x86_64 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:36:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87efyimlfg.fsf@pobox.com> References: <020446f67310f6f047682583769b6f28.squirrel@somewhere-in-the-space.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488293838 16576 195.159.176.226 (28 Feb 2017 14:57:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:57:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 22141@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Arnaud Gardelein" Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 28 15:57:13 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cijDE-0003hy-Je for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:57:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33586 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cijDK-0003Fz-GQ for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:57:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ciitm-0003Vp-Nv for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:37:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ciiti-0007AR-Pq for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:37:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ciiti-0007AM-Iz for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciiti-0008T9-7N for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22141 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22141-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22141.148829262132548 (code B ref 22141); Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22141) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2017 14:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciith-0008Su-5x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:37:01 -0500 Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.67]:56007 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ciitg-0008Sm-1l for 22141@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C596B5F32F; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:36:59 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=FobEv5Lp6hiByuWifVEhzTNfq3E=; b=TtLPs5 xOag9rtRiVOQA/Fnl5mjmV+B7TxftJZPrtXOAfgSNrtr7+FraZEYTl4HfSDm/9zP D9f8chWsGq1lmjRHvSRbHKupvE3s2F4YWvHxmW3oNOXiclCS627CocmP5lLcEAmA J5JoyRPTfASsNU8z69eGrhHCNsfA5WhrmnmIw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=UtY4Ad9+RpMIs8WTh/dC51wtfwdFLXuN KQLledC03E1Ix1sWDP7Uah0zi5LWAIO5jrwleb10Tl36eiZinAAZ6htY+NnJItaQ yphewg55LboCK2aYq1EBxJIpqxdwAtYsp2k7zo+Z1ZOqB41kSOUktO72qroj7fYS R9wLfDbWUlE= Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6545F32D; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:36:59 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A414D5F32C; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:36:58 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <020446f67310f6f047682583769b6f28.squirrel@somewhere-in-the-space.org> (Arnaud Gardelein's message of "Tue, 23 Aug 2016 17:01:54 +0200") X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5C42F1C0-FDC3-11E6-A908-6141F2301B6D-02397024!pb-sasl2.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8584 Archived-At: On Tue 23 Aug 2016 17:01, "Arnaud Gardelein" writes: > CC libguile_2.2_la-weak-set.lo > weak-set.c:165:1: error: conflicting types for 'GC_move_disappearing_link' > GC_move_disappearing_link (void **from, void **to) > ^ > In file included from ../libguile/bdw-gc.h:47:0, > from ../libguile/gc.h:186, > from ../libguile/pairs.h:28, > from ../libguile/_scm.h:74, > from weak-set.c:27: > ../gc/gc.h:1147:20: note: previous declaration of > 'GC_move_disappearing_link' was here > GC_API int GC_CALL GC_move_disappearing_link(void ** /* link */, I believe this indicates that the GC_move_disappearing_link check failed in your ./configure, while it was in fact actually there. Have you had any success in the meantime with later prereleases? Andy