From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC? Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:11:58 -0700 Message-ID: <87efprkv8h.fsf__3307.55114923722$1508951621$gmane$org@gnu.org> References: <87wp9gwz8m.fsf@gnu.org> <87fug4o8z2.fsf@pobox.com> <87wp54z3p5.fsf@gnu.org> <87zi9th1i6.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87y3o454pr.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2tvncs5.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87wp3mwwef.fsf@gnu.org> <87po9c88rx.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87o9owm9v1.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9ow830m.fsf@dustycloud.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1508951621 23602 195.159.176.226 (25 Oct 2017 17:13:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:13:41 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: Andy Wingo , 19180@debbugs.gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org To: Christopher Allan Webber Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 25 19:13:35 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7PEo-0002Qd-CZ for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 19:13:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49347 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7PEu-00078D-44 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33785) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7PEo-000786-Vq for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:13:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7PEk-0003U5-Kf for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7PEk-0003Tt-Gv for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7PEk-0005ri-3S for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19180 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19180-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19180.150895152522469 (code B ref 19180); Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19180) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2017 17:12:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7PDp-0005qL-E8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:50607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7PDn-0005qD-LS for 19180@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:12:04 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD24F51A; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 19:12:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Original-Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oi_NqrLHRsP3; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 19:12:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ribbon (node-1w7jr9qot7winqrne9k8b99d1.ipv6.telus.net [IPv6:2001:569:7803:2c00:728:f466:18ad:22a5]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B77A088; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 19:12:01 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 4 Brumaire an 226 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <87o9ow830m.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Allan Webber's message of "Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:50:01 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8859 Archived-At: Christopher Allan Webber skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Christopher Allan Webber skribis: >> >>> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >>> >>>> Also, it no longer displays the pathological behavior shown in >>>> . >>>> >>>> Of course, even better if people could test the two patches and confirm >>>> that it works for them. >>>> >>>> Then if there are no objections I=E2=80=99d like to merge them in =E2= =80=98stable-2.2=E2=80=99. >>> >>> Sounds great indeed, but it didn't apply to master or stable-2.2 for me? >> >> Really? The two patches should apply to stable-2.2, though you need to >> apply them in the right order (I have it applied over >> 80696023620eae12f9b2f167aee834f632a32739.) >> >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > Huh? What object is this? I don't see it in my git repo. My bad, it=E2=80=99s actually ac0d3dcc533850d25f3e533c04c1c238a83f190b. Ludo=E2=80=99.