From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#74385: [PATCH 4/4] srfi-64: Report failed tests in (standards)Errors format. Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 18:02:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87ed2gn60u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20241116174210.9160-1-~@wolfsden.cz> <20241116174210.9160-4-~@wolfsden.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26647"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 74385@debbugs.gnu.org, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 09 18:04:33 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tKhBR-0006lc-0S for guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 18:04:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tKhBJ-00059G-MM; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:04:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tKhB0-00051D-QM for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:04:16 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tKhAw-00013k-EC for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:04:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=Ttcfw+Eu1MMRfnOOAA/RwHd2aGCPWK6OkG1wmQdVf/g=; b=cICIjatyfbMTnOE1oJ+vHiwws6iZnQCtG9X5m9H2J/GfpXOR/oYp6+W6MEDp67Q0eLOIi5ilzLN9q3IZbnlxtr3XP9XkI2ctP6S+YnxPRf8s7ua02q5N21fhPMZL9Et2sx0iZVWWPbBnpnA3xaZkkKBeCIS0SjEQJOLS7ygMeEuTk0Q0k7gzwnwEtpv6r6FqP7hcxrsMfVFkCQ/p18QIBk0ds1/yE6cMBgXOjW7aJuj+zmrkldOhPZfx6uimwyDfY3p9JIRbH+UKqu6P35jPRwzlb+EEmnJ7GbZGXK4pruK9ltbOsIaas3kceOLIjIVXHm2299QaWoZeAvI63tefBQ==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tKhAw-0008My-45 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:04:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 17:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74385 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 74385-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74385.173376379132086 (code B ref 74385); Mon, 09 Dec 2024 17:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 74385) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2024 17:03:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55387 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tKhA7-0008LQ-DI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:03:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tKhA5-0008LB-1t for 74385@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tKh9y-0000YQ-Kb; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:03:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=Ttcfw+Eu1MMRfnOOAA/RwHd2aGCPWK6OkG1wmQdVf/g=; b=MyRZSsYPgQ57CKAsA4K2 ey20pzKJ1R72r/3z07ZnvYgh/FQIHJ8AalxzTfobwreAuZA4uq/u97RlQ77YM79pG5NRFBkBjt4Fq hUJjYtDKXRe/gl8HIZ/+dTIp+pDXYTfjMTwrlwGBJ2tfHbWEsMhqnXNve1bCzmyeTepsaC+ox3mpb rXBrPeoOse0RcuK+TFqFwxSwIoKuI9Uj4X5ZWXB54gOa2sQ/CUJqKy+MnCvFKKKt/C5DJal3o+vlY i/YuEi18MXFrSsF5c0it1y0ubG/BAQZp3/l5p16OrTcDSx3hPX1gpaj6yL6G4sC2b3RKQ4zMaMQ4w XV5q7TJNZuFqxA==; In-Reply-To: <20241116174210.9160-4-~@wolfsden.cz> (Tomas Volf's message of "Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:42:07 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:11112 Archived-At: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis: > There is a page in the GNU Standards document regarding the format of err= or > messages. Both GNU Emacs and Vim are able to parse it and support jumpin= g to > next/previous error. My version did not produce a line in this format for > failed tests and this commit rectifies that. > > * module/srfi/srfi-64.scm (test-on-test-end-simple)[non-passed]: Write > out (standards)Errors compatible line. > > Reported-by: Janneke Nieuwenhuizen I personally like this but my gut feeling is that we may want to stick to whatever the previous SRFI-64 implementation was doing, to avoid disruption or breakage for users (remember we=E2=80=99re applying this to a stable series).