From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: [PATCH] lambda* fails with #:key and rest argument Date: 08 Jul 2002 00:37:39 +0200 Sender: bug-guile-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87d6tz6u6k.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026102747 24940 127.0.0.1 (8 Jul 2002 04:32:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 04:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ttn@glug.org, crayc@pyro.net, bug-guile@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17RQCJ-0006Tv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 06:32:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RQCv-0005OK-00; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 00:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173] helo=monty-python) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RPlx-00016k-02 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2002 00:05:13 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip183.dokom.de ([195.138.42.183] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by monty-python with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17RKf0-0006wp-00 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 18:37:42 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 21674 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Jul 2002 22:37:40 -0000 Original-To: Dirk Herrmann In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: bug-guile-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:364 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:364 Dirk Herrmann writes: > I assume that the problem is also relevant for the newer branches. > There, we could think of providing a public improper-list-copy in list.c > instead of providing it privately within optargs.scm. Do we want that? Yes, that looks like the better option to me. What names are other Schemes using for this operation? We shouldn't be gratuitously incompatible. Also, should improper-list-copy be able to copy circular lists, or only dotted lists? SRFI-1 list-copy can copy dotted lists. Maybe we can just use it. _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile