From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10519: guile and (mini-)gmp Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:46:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87d39ugqst.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ipjojarx.fsf@pobox.com> <86r4ybk7on.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328395652 30077 80.91.229.3 (4 Feb 2012 22:47:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 22:47:32 +0000 (UTC) To: 10519@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 04 23:47:31 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoOE-0000BN-Mg for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:47:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53492 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoOE-0007rt-5l for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:47:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59481) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoOA-0007rZ-Op for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:47:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoO9-0000E8-PD for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:47:22 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51094) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoO9-0000E4-MO for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:47:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoOo-00061q-0j for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:48:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10519 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.132839567423160 (code B ref -1); Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2012 22:47:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54717 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoOg-00061U-Gk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:47:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38515) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoOe-00061I-0I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:47:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoNq-0000DN-Co for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:47:05 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:50399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoNq-0000DJ-BN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59445) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoNm-0007pz-RB for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoNj-0000D1-7e for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:46:58 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoNj-0000Cu-2c for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:46:55 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RtoNf-0008MU-3n for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:46:51 +0100 Original-Received: from 126.1-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be ([87.64.1.126]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:46:51 +0100 Original-Received: from ludo by 126.1-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:46:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 126.1-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 =?UTF-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 220 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6cix/AKkMUyeyU5EfEhaRshowbA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6201 Archived-At: Hello, Torbjorn Granlund skribis: > nisse@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes: > > Andy Wingo writes: > > > One suggestion, if it's possible: it would be great if mini-gmp could > > make it to be part of gnulib at some point. > > It's main home will be the GMP repo and distributions. But that doesn't > exclude that it's also copied into gnulib, if that's convenient. > > We should make a VERY clear note in the file about the home position, > and that the file should better not be extended and put into gnulib, to > avoid incompatibility between two version. Gnulib has bits from libc, for example, and in that case the module file has “libc” in its “Maintainer” field. So I guess the maintainer of the mini-gmp module could be “gmp”. Thanks, Ludo.’