unofficial mirror of bug-guile@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: Jan Schukat <shookie@email.de>
Cc: 13848@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0.
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:32:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d2v85367.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5130D52F.3000704@email.de> (Jan Schukat's message of "Fri, 01 Mar 2013 17:19:59 +0100")

Hi,

On Fri 01 Mar 2013 17:19, Jan Schukat <shookie@email.de> writes:

> But compiling guile-2.0 on MinGW is a very hairy undertaking. I'm not
> sure how often it is tested by the developers.

Approximately never, unfortunately.  However we have been improving it
recently, and cross-compiling from GNU systems to MinGW is done
occasionally.

I will mostly address concerns about cross-compiling.  Note that you
should really be using Guile from stable-2.0 git and the latest MinGW.

The easiest way to do that is to install a Fedora 18 VM, because they
package mingw very well and are closest to upstream.  I'm a Debian user
and that's what I did, FWIW.  I haven't yet tried with Debian itself.

Also I would mention that dynamic linking should work on Windows, if all
your DLLs are in the same folder.  But I am ignorant and maybe that
doesn't work.

> Also, when you link statically and the symbol resolving works
> differently, you have to go through some hoops to resolve boehm-gc
> symbols, despite the preprocessor guards: That concerns
> HAVE_GC_SET_FINALIZER_NOTIFIER, HAVE_GC_GET_HEAP_USAGE_SAFE,
> HAVE_GC_GET_FREE_SPACE_DIVISOR, HAVE_GC_SET_FINALIZE_ON_DEMAND. In guile
> there are statically defined fallbacks for the respective functions,
> that cause linker conflicts when statically linked. Those functions
> probably should be renamed completely to prevent this kind of problem.

Are you saying that symbols with internal, static linkage inside bdw-gc
conflict with static symbols inside Guile?  This sounds like a
misconfiguration issue.

> Then there is also the old problem of the conflicting definitions of
> struct timespec on MinGW in time.h and pthreads.h.

FWIW I did not experience this in my cross-compile.

> The bug #13768 about scm_getpid being used in "--without-posix" builds I
> have sent already.

Fixed upstream; thanks.

> Also, on mingw the guile-tools/guild copy script can't deal with the
> .exe ending. I have to configure and make once with
> --program-suffix=.exe to create the proper script names and files, and
> then again without, so they can be copied. (or find and copy them by
> hand between builds)

Are you certain that the meta/guile and meta/guild scripts need the .exe
extension?  They are not EXE files.  MinGW should add on .exe to
programs like libguile/guile (NB: not meta/guile) as needed.

Also note that I just fixed a bug in meta/guile in which it was
referencing libguile/guile without the @EXEEXT@.

Basically I think --program-suffix is not what you want.

> But then on install (processing .texi files) guile.exe fails with this
> message:
>
> "Throw without catch before boot:
> Throw to key system-error with args ("canonicalize-path" "~A" ("No such
> file or directory") (2))Aborting.

This is fixed in git, I believe.

I think we're close.  Can you give it another try?  If needed I can
handle the autogen side of things and give you a freshly prepared
tarball.

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/





  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-09  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-01 16:19 bug#13848: Statically linking guile-2.0 Jan Schukat
2013-03-02 15:28 ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-03-03 23:20   ` Jan Schukat
2013-03-05  0:54   ` Jan Schukat
2013-03-05 10:22     ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-03-05 15:44       ` Jan Schukat
2013-03-05 17:25         ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-03-05 22:25           ` Jan Schukat
2013-03-06 23:12             ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-03-09 13:44               ` Jan Schukat
2013-03-09 23:06                 ` Andy Wingo
2013-03-09 23:57                   ` shookie
2013-03-10  4:09                   ` shookie
2013-03-10 17:32                     ` Andy Wingo
2013-03-10 18:54                       ` shookie
2013-03-10 19:23                       ` Andy Wingo
2013-03-10 21:17                         ` shookie
2013-03-10 22:03                         ` shookie
2013-03-10 22:53                           ` Andy Wingo
2013-03-11  0:07                             ` shookie
2013-03-11  1:43                             ` shookie
2013-03-11  8:26                               ` Andy Wingo
2013-03-11  9:30                                 ` shookie
2013-03-13  9:30                                   ` Andy Wingo
2013-03-13 19:04                                     ` bug#13848: Aw: " Jan Schukat
2013-03-16  1:36                                     ` Jan Schukat
2013-03-29 19:35                                       ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-03-30  0:20                                         ` Jan Schukat
2013-03-30 21:27                                           ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-04-05 23:14                                             ` Jan Schukat
2013-04-07 10:20                                               ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-04-07 16:20                                                 ` bug#13848: Aw: " Jan Schukat
2013-04-07 18:22                                                   ` Andy Wingo
2013-04-07 19:18                                                     ` bug#13848: Aw: " Jan Schukat
2013-04-07 20:00                                                       ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-04-07 21:06                                                         ` bug#13848: Aw: " Jan Schukat
2013-04-08  7:48                                                           ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-03-10 17:38                   ` shookie
2013-03-10 17:38                   ` shookie
2013-03-14 13:54                   ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-03-09  9:32 ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2013-03-09 15:42   ` Jan Schukat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d2v85367.fsf@pobox.com \
    --to=wingo@pobox.com \
    --cc=13848@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=shookie@email.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).