From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#14128: web/http.scm: bad-header date check (UTC?) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:33:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87d2ubaoon.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364985123 16228 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2013 10:32:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: aconchillo@gmail.com, 14128@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Hartwig Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 03 12:32:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UNKzW-0002D4-2M for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:32:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57062 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNKz6-0000jk-Vh for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:32:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNKz3-0000jf-MM for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNKz0-0004BB-SJ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:32:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNKz0-0004B6-Pr for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:31:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UNL1x-0001EC-SL for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:35:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14128 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, Aleix Conchillo =?UTF-8?Q?Flaqu=C3=A9?= Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13649852864687 (code B ref -1); Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2013 10:34:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UNL1i-0001DX-5P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:34:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57180) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UNL1f-0001DM-8o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:34:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNKyg-000467-G2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:31:39 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:38103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNKyg-000463-Cl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:31:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40297) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNKye-0000Xz-UK for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:31:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNKyc-00045B-Et for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:31:36 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp205.alice.it ([82.57.200.101]:34472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNKyb-00044u-VV for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:31:34 -0400 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (79.10.68.114) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.060.15) id 511D1074074DAC96; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 12:31:29 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UNL0s-00043H-Qc; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:33:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Daniel Hartwig's message of "Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:47:01 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:7056 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () Daniel Hartwig () Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:47:01 +0800 Apparently we are supposed to do this a bit more and accomodate yet another non-compliant service? Maybe that stuff should be exposed to the user. Do a best effort conversion and if not successful, return a pair =E2=80=98(raw-string . STRI= NG)=E2=80=99 or whatever -- it's enough that it has a different type and that the type is documented. This way, you avoid carrying forward lots of cruft. Do it now before it's too late! Erk. What is the point of defining protocols and standards then? One purpose is to challenge programmers to learn how and when to say "no". =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFcBYwACgkQZwMiJEyAdQJbFgCfVFlcJ73xkVGaZRcE75prwf8G EFoAoI8W9YsGXVdv0Xq7yV/gW+Hqe9Jk =6cuk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--