From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Cc: Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>,
19180@debbugs.gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC?
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 23:18:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d154wa7o.fsf__28392.2140290544$1509401964$gmane$org@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878tfslfgl.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Mon, 30 Oct 2017 18:20:58 +0100")
Hi,
Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> skribis:
> previously I wrote:
>
>> The “guile-awesome” package finished compiling (after about 46 minutes).
>> I’m now testing “guix pull” with a version of Guix that uses
>> “guile-awesome”.
>
> I’m sure I’m doing something wrong (see below for guesses). Here’s what
> I get:
>
> ./pre-inst-env guix pull
> loading... 26.0% of 645 filesrandom seed for tests: 1509382171
> compiling... 18.9% of 645 filesIn thread:
> ERROR: In procedure return: return used outside of 'with-monad'Error while printing exception.
> compiling... 54.7% of 645 files^C
The error above is the other bug you reported, not related (but just as
serious): <https://bugs.gnu.org/27476>.
> I modified build-self.scm to use the modified Guile:
>
> diff --git a/build-aux/build-self.scm b/build-aux/build-self.scm
> index ed8ff5f..9af6504 100644
> --- a/build-aux/build-self.scm
> +++ b/build-aux/build-self.scm
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ running Guile."
> (package->derivation (cond-expand
> (guile-2.2
> (canonical-package
> - (specification->package "guile@2.2")))
> + (specification->package "guile-awesome@2.2")))
> (else
> (canonical-package
> (specification->package "guile@2.0"))))))
>
> I also confirmed that the Guile process that is spawned as “bin/guile
> --no-auto-compile /home/rwurmus/guix/scripts/guix pull” is indeed the
> modified Guile, but I noticed that it spawns yet another Guile process
> to load and compile Guix.
>
> I guess that comes from the daemon? If that’s the case I can’t really
> test this on this big server, because the daemon is currently in use, so
> I can’t just reconfigure it to use the modified Guile.
Your patch above should have led to the use of “guile-awesome” to
compile Guix; I’m not sure why it didn’t.
> When compiling Guix from source with “make -j 32” using that version of
> Guile I got a segfault.
Oh?
Let’s put this on hold since Andy offers a different solution.
Thanks for testing!
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-30 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87wp9gwz8m.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <87fug4o8z2.fsf@pobox.com>
[not found] ` <87wp54z3p5.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <87zi9th1i6.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <87y3o454pr.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <87r2tvncs5.fsf@dustycloud.org>
[not found] ` <87wp3mwwef.fsf@gnu.org>
[not found] ` <87po9c88rx.fsf@dustycloud.org>
[not found] ` <87o9owm9v1.fsf@gnu.org>
2017-10-25 0:50 ` bug#19180: Weak tables harmful to GC? Christopher Allan Webber
[not found] ` <87o9ow830m.fsf@dustycloud.org>
2017-10-25 17:11 ` Ludovic Courtès
[not found] ` <87mv4gd0ik.fsf@elephly.net>
2017-10-25 6:38 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2017-10-26 7:03 ` Ludovic Courtès
[not found] ` <87a80eie63.fsf@gnu.org>
2017-10-26 8:35 ` Ricardo Wurmus
[not found] ` <87k1zimhmt.fsf@elephly.net>
2017-10-26 16:52 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2017-10-26 17:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
[not found] ` <87bmktn96e.fsf@elephly.net>
2017-10-27 5:28 ` Ludovic Courtès
[not found] ` <87tvyl9n22.fsf@gnu.org>
2017-10-28 9:56 ` Ricardo Wurmus
[not found] ` <87r2tnlhno.fsf@elephly.net>
2017-10-30 12:35 ` Ludovic Courtès
[not found] ` <87a8087qz7.fsf@gnu.org>
2017-10-30 14:48 ` Ricardo Wurmus
[not found] ` <87d154lmio.fsf@mdc-berlin.de>
2017-10-30 17:20 ` Ricardo Wurmus
[not found] ` <878tfslfgl.fsf@mdc-berlin.de>
2017-10-30 22:18 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2017-10-30 17:29 ` Andy Wingo
2017-10-30 23:13 ` Ludovic Courtès
[not found] ` <87zi88ut3k.fsf@gnu.org>
2017-10-31 8:25 ` Andy Wingo
[not found] ` <877evbiuzy.fsf@igalia.com>
2017-10-31 16:56 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='87d154wa7o.fsf__28392.2140290544$1509401964$gmane$org@gnu.org' \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=19180@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de \
--cc=wingo@igalia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).