From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#30144: [PATCH] doc: Document (ice-9 match) macros. Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:33:16 -0400 Message-ID: <87d1044p2r.fsf@netris.org> References: <20180117122504.25583-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <87woyc4qcs.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1521174790 3302 195.159.176.226 (16 Mar 2018 04:33:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 04:33:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: 30144@debbugs.gnu.org To: Arun Isaac Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 16 05:33:06 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ewh3B-0000md-UJ for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 05:33:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54967 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewh5F-0004RM-0M for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:35:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47019) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewh59-0004PZ-04 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewh54-0005jW-0g for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewh53-0005ip-Sj for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:35:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ewh53-0001PI-KW for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:35:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 04:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30144 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 30144-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30144.15211748585347 (code B ref 30144); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 04:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30144) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Mar 2018 04:34:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35657 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ewh4M-0001OA-0A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:34:18 -0400 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:48022) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ewh4L-0001Nz-8T for 30144@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:34:17 -0400 Original-Received: from pool-72-93-30-18.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.93.30.18] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ewh4F-0003oJ-Ff; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:34:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87woyc4qcs.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:05:39 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:9027 Archived-At: Mark H Weaver writes: > Arun Isaac writes: >> +@deffn {Scheme Syntax} match-lambda exp clause1 clause2 @dots{} >> +Create a procedure of one argument that matches its argument against >> +each clause. > > How about adding "and evaluates the corresponding expressions" or > something like that? It occurs to me that we should also document the return value. How about adding "and returns the result(s) of evaluating the corresponding expressions"? Mark