From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Rottmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Segfault using call/cc on ia64 (and possibly others) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:46:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87brbijkw4.fsf__10407.719834666$1117217387$gmane$org@ivanova.rotty.yi.org> References: <873bwulq83.fsf@ivanova.rotty.yi.org> <87hdlae860.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117217387 22983 80.91.229.2 (27 May 2005 18:09:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 18:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 27 20:09:38 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DbjFt-0001Xv-Hx for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 20:08:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DbjKB-00089W-UZ for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 14:12:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CsB3A-0005zF-9u for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:30:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CsB37-0005xn-Fx for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:30:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CsB37-0005x8-Dg for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:30:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CsAoV-0003zr-Ol for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:15:47 -0500 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CsAn1-0003g7-Jj for guile-bugs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:14:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1CsAT2-0002qT-8O for guile-bugs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:53:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CsAT1-0002qP-RW for guile-bugs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:53:36 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2005 01:46:53 -0000 Original-Received: from chello080109053157.14.14.univie.teleweb.at (EHLO garibaldi) (80.109.53.157) by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 22 Jan 2005 02:46:53 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3102804 Original-Received: from ivanova.rhinosaur.lan ([192.168.1.9] helo=ivanova) by garibaldi with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CsAM8-0001hQ-UF; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:46:44 +0100 Original-Received: from andy by ivanova with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CsAMF-0004XM-AV; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:46:35 +0100 Original-To: Guile Developers , guile-bugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87hdlae860.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:20:23 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 27 May 2005 14:10:47 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3019 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3019 Kevin Ryde writes: > Andreas Rottmann writes: >> >> Segfaults in the G-Wrap testsuite[0] seem to indicate that this might >> be a problem on alpha, > > Your one-liner seems ok for me on alpha. Propose something for the > test suite in any case. > This means I'm going to have to investigate this G-Wrap testsuite segfaults further on at least alpha and sparc. Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann | Rotty@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile