From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: 1.8.2 manual describes debugger breakpoint functionality that doesn't exist Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:59:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87bqaqylsr.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <570262.82125.qm@web37904.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <873ay5gz02.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193148013 2322 80.91.229.12 (23 Oct 2007 14:00:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bug Guile To: Mike Gran Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 23 16:00:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IkKIg-0005mo-Qb for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:00:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkKIY-0002pu-Md for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:59:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IkKHg-0002e4-9L for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IkKHf-0002dl-Hs for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkKHf-0002dh-Cp for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IkKHf-00083s-0X for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-145-152-23.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.152.23]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20E61F671B; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:59:01 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from laruns (unknown [192.168.0.10]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756E338009; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:59:00 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <873ay5gz02.fsf@laas.fr> (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s's?= message of "Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:31:09 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3644 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > Hi, > > Mike Gran writes: > >> The 1.8.2 manual, in the 3.4.X Intro to Breakpoints section describes >> functionality that doesn't exist, and suggests adding to the .guile >> file the following libraries that do not appear in the distro >> >> (ice-9 debugger breakpoints) >> (ice-9 debugger breakpoints source) >> (ice-9 debugger breakpoints procedural) >> >> I seem to recall that there was a thread about moving these to their >> own package, right? > > Right. At some point before 1.8.1 was released, Neil started > integrating Guile-Debugging [0] into 1.8 and HEAD. Then it was > suggested that putting it into the 1.8 branch may not be appropriate, so > he removed it. He must have left the doc bits you're referring to at > that moment. We'll fix it in 1.8.3. Well I didn't manage to fix the manual in time for 1.8.3, but it is fixed now in 1.8.x CVS, so will be correct in 1.8.4. Apologies for any confusion caused! Neil _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile