From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#29464: gcc-7 breaks guile-2.2.2? Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:19:26 -0600 Message-ID: <87bmii839t.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <87vagq8kds.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1514528302 30620 195.159.176.226 (29 Dec 2017 06:18:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 06:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 29464@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dan Kegel Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 29 07:18:17 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eUnzi-0007Lx-DQ for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:18:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56578 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eUo1f-0008VB-Mi for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:20:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eUo1W-0008UN-Dz for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eUo1S-0005iZ-Ek for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:20:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47046) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eUo1S-0005hz-9r for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eUo1R-0007D2-QM for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:20:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Rob Browning Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 06:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29464 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 29464-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29464.151452837027672 (code B ref 29464); Fri, 29 Dec 2017 06:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29464) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2017 06:19:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55727 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eUo0w-0007CG-Hb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:19:30 -0500 Original-Received: from defaultvalue.org ([45.33.119.55]:47638 ident=postfix) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eUo0u-0007C7-R7 for 29464@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:19:29 -0500 Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D460202D2; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:19:27 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B997E14E569; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:19:26 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8938 Archived-At: Dan Kegel writes: > Does the bug even happen without the vestigal -O0 ? > I removed that and things seem to be going better in 2.2.3, > 0 failures out of 4 runs :-) > See https://launchpad.net/~dank/+archive/ubuntu/guile-2.2/+packages I'm fairly sure it did, and a build with -fno-stack-protector just finished successfully, so for the moment, I think I may proceed with that and get the builds started on the other architectures. Then I can try removing -O0 again. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4