From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10974: guile-user@gnu.org Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:17:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87a9zhrbvh.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87wr2mv6y4.fsf@gnu.org> <87vci5rg54.fsf@pobox.com> <871uktu6z2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341271113 30004 80.91.229.3 (2 Jul 2012 23:18:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10974@debbugs.gnu.org, Alexei Matveev To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 03 01:18:31 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Slpt0-0000If-Nt for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:18:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39938 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Slpsz-0007qt-HP for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:18:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Slpsw-0007qg-N9 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:18:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Slpsv-0003D7-0H for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34086) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Slpsu-0003Cz-QP for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:18:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SlpxO-0003gx-9Q for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10974 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10974-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10974.134127135914161 (code B ref 10974); Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10974) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2012 23:22:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43632 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Slpx1-0003gL-4i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:42875 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Slpwz-0003gE-4O for 10974@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:22:38 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0B6CC85; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 19:17:58 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=q7s/8i0+tJeD ZwgtYqjKIJO60MA=; b=aEhnuxbInpcE/MdOjNL0C5iKRtGw1+fJp67k6aWRdDfH jGVa/hAhLgBA7pOJLe5FZ0154xUanodwDw2fs6d15zbCmh2uMqX+8QW9Br+Cqndo Kl7HIRmYrJGFqY7+lwW1+BmQGE6HQNXV8Uy/+omU5/l/Ivn8MkMEEgtj4GlkvzI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=YznRM8 l8Vo7RDTMtNrtVcL1Pq8qYhX4WUY1Y4+mssWRMI2BJuk5BpJuQyVNcLDD1iuIL1t dZ3AF95JJ8i5Sh95+ofvuaNHWu3dkIQqUo1ZjKaGAmjfaqvjUKb0PBAciaqEtZ2y ysAj/Y/CgH9+RA8VRH8Cosiwi2u2p0A+jVNuo= Original-Received: from b-pb-sasl-sd. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FD1CC84; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 19:17:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [89.131.176.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 967A1CC83; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 19:17:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871uktu6z2.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:35:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 28E1A192-C49C-11E1-AB3B-FA6787E41631-02397024!b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6377 Archived-At: On Tue 03 Jul 2012 00:35, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Andy Wingo skribis: > >> Would this be "fixed" if we changed these to be implemented as inline >> functions? > > In some way, though their address could still not be taken. Sorry to be obtuse, but with our inline functions, we also residualize a concrete instantiation (via the inline.c madness). Does that not work? A --=20 http://wingolog.org/