From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#13611: SEGV during SMOB GC Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:13:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9rih3bu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1359838300.89158.YahooMailNeo@web120405.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <87y5f3t6o8.fsf@gnu.org> <1360081788.3781.YahooMailNeo@web120406.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <876226sogd.fsf@gnu.org> <1360083888.57707.YahooMailNeo@web120402.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360098841 14945 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2013 21:14:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 21:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "13611@debbugs.gnu.org" <13611@debbugs.gnu.org> To: Mike Gran Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 05 22:14:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U2pqL-0007Dn-9h for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:14:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38462 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2ppz-0003Gk-MK for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:13:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2ppv-0003GU-Ee for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:13:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2ppu-0002tP-83 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:13:51 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:32925) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U2ppu-0002tL-4Y for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:13:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2pr4-0003ak-2Q for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13611 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13611-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13611.136009886713742 (code B ref 13611); Tue, 05 Feb 2013 21:15:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13611) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2013 21:14:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38389 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2pqU-0003ZY-RP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:14:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:20056) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U2pqR-0003ZQ-Sr for 13611@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:14:25 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,609,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="1182447" Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO pluto) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 05 Feb 2013 22:07:32 +0100 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 17 =?UTF-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 221 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <1360083888.57707.YahooMailNeo@web120402.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> (Mike Gran's message of "Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:04:48 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6738 Archived-At: Mike Gran skribis: >>> Is that expected that GC is sometimes called from a=20 > >>> thread where scm_i_current_thread is null and sometimes >>> called from a thread where scm_i_current_thread is >>> not null? >>=20 >> Can you check whether your GC was built with --enable-parallel-mark? >>=20 >> I=E2=80=99m confident that the SMOB mark procedure is never called with = null >> scm_i_current_thread with 7.2 compiled with the default options (the >> GnuTLS bindings rely on this, and I had not seen any such report until >> someone tried with GC 7.3pre, which uses the parallel marker by >> default.) > > It looks like fedora gc rpms do use --enable-parallel-mark > for x86 architectures. Then that=E2=80=99s the problem. > But it looks like it has been that way for a long time. > Since 2005 at least. And you did not have the problem before? That part of Guile hasn=E2=80=99t changed in a long time, I think. Ludo=E2=80=99.