From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#21093: Web server: response bodies systematically loaded in memory Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:10:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87a8uriysr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1437343885 5495 80.91.229.3 (19 Jul 2015 22:11:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 22:11:25 +0000 (UTC) To: 21093@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 20 00:11:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwni-000649-3F for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:11:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53035 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwnh-0003yw-C3 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:11:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35394) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwne-0003yr-9l for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:11:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwnX-0005Bs-D3 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:11:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwnX-0005Bm-9z for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwnW-0001Ie-56 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:11:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 22:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 21093 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14373438474973 (code B ref -1); Sun, 19 Jul 2015 22:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2015 22:10:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwnH-0001I9-HQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:10:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50000) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwnF-0001Hw-B0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:10:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwn9-00052I-8t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:39385) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwn9-00052E-6f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwn8-0003yi-11 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwn0-0004xo-VJ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:10:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwn0-0004xk-QD for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:10:30 -0400 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:44423 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGwn0-0006kj-4r for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:10:30 -0400 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 2 Thermidor an 223 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:7813 Archived-At: The =E2=80=98sanitize-response=E2=80=99 procedure systematically loads the = whole response body in memory, which causes obvious scalability issues (this is in 2.0.11.) In particular, when a request handler returns a port-taking procedure as its second return value, =E2=80=98sanitize-request=E2=80=99 will just call = that procedure passing it a string output port. This procedure should instead be called from the server implementation=E2= =80=99s =E2=80=98write=E2=80=99 hook, but that would necessitate an API change. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99.