From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#15280: Building on native mingw fails Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:49:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87a8ie3jgz.fsf@pobox.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466506240 4883 80.91.229.3 (21 Jun 2016 10:50:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15280-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Jan Schukat" Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 21 12:50:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJG6-0008L7-BY for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:50:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50720 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJG0-0004gh-Mo for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 06:50:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJFt-0004dI-UB for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 06:50:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJFq-0003Oh-NL for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 06:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36265) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJFq-0003Od-Je for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 06:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJFq-0006JL-E2 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 06:50:02 -0400 Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 15280 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 15280@debbugs.gnu.org, wingo@pobox.com, shookie@email.de Original-Received: via spool by 15280-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D15280.146650616724208 (code D ref 15280); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15280-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2016 10:49:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48602 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJFH-0006IN-DA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 06:49:27 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:58866 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bFJFG-0006IG-C9 for 15280-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 06:49:26 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0A52200F; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 06:49:24 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=6pCFw05NPVQDTspTzgYRyb2i08M=; b=Swv/1x SAGIHUvaq9yEOUsn0PaczXoV8w4s4oKxRIjIh/zZPIFxdeWoXvRPxUSI8QCeHUeX hPCYq3sBUbeToMvD12W0oQGbF5spAk5ILaa5NThywwtosEUZBid0evTc9FcGk6gp EnlC0nRLblIq2ZQwumagSvO9Bp5J7MzMx3jJ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=tYNFj+5ArwIHdEVJgXVeDGpAoqMha4MQ Ts9tU6Kl2YFBZc83osi2cN4wQ7QPNdHhFf0BofLraWYddmJDnkKn4jEQ5IQ2R3pi PXEcBhoykbi6ceT81hW2bJSEQBIx20jlZ1I53WgfYqUua8ZRptw1qA5/7rDCCklp AiJ4PZFBkYw= Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D8C2200E; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 06:49:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BBD32200D; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 06:49:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Jan Schukat's message of "Fri, 6 Sep 2013 00:42:25 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D0D92BD6-379D-11E6-B7BE-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8073 Archived-At: Hi Jan, I believe that Eli Zaretskii builds natively on MinGW. I know we do cross-build as well. I'm going to archive this bug; please open a new one if you have a problem with the most recent releases. Thanks! Andy On Fri 06 Sep 2013 00:42, "Jan Schukat" writes: > Hello again, > I'm trying windows builds on mingw again. My system is a 64bit Windows > 7 and the uname -a of my mingw is this: > MINGW32_NT-6.1 DIOGENES 1.0.18(0.48/3/2) 2012-11-21 22:34 i686 Msys > My guile package is > http://hydra.nixos.org/build/5775717/download/3/guile-2.0.9.76-0ac084-dirty.tar.gz > I made 3 different builds, and have the logs of all three attached. > First build is without any changes to the guile source. Whith this > HAVE_MSVC_INVALID_PARAMETER_HANDLER and > MSVC_INVALID_PARAMETER_HANDLING == DEFAULT_HANDLING are defined and > the gcc 4.8.1 stumbles over cdecl on line 31 in msvc-inval.c > Then I change cdecl to __cdecl on that line. GCC compiles but when > guile-procedures.texi is generated, guile.exe throws this in a message > box: > "The procedure entry point _set_invalid_parameter_handler could not be > located in the dynamic link library msvcrt.dll." > Final attempt is manually disabling > HAVE_MSVC_INVALID_PARAMETER_HANDLER in the config.h after configure > was executed. With this the old backtrace on generating > guile-procedures.texi comes up again: > Backtrace: > In unknown file: > ?: 3 [apply-smob/1 # #t ...] > ?: 2 [apply-smob/1 # quit #] > ?: 1 [apply-smob/1 # #t ...] > ?: 0 [apply-smob/1 #]