From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathieu Othacehe Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#43521: ports.test "non-revealed port is closed" breaks other tests Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:14:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87a6tf5wv4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ft7d601y.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87d02h5zlt.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87a6xl5wl3.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19174"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 43521@debbugs.gnu.org To: Rob Browning Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 11 16:15:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyuW-0004nR-Dt for guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:15:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49100 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyuV-0006wa-E5 for guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:15:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyuN-0006ud-3x for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyuM-0003Nj-Sm for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyuM-00071T-P5 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43521 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile Original-Received: via spool by 43521-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43521.161037808926948 (code B ref 43521); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43521) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2021 15:14:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57805 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyu8-00070a-Sw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:14:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55638) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyu7-00070P-L9 for 43521@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:14:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyu2-0003KI-73; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:14:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:d54b:f4e5:4687:8012] (port=51332 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyu1-00035s-4Y; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:14:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87a6xl5wl3.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:40:40 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:9946 Archived-At: Hello Rob, > I ended up doing that for now: > > https://salsa.debian.org/rlb/deb-guile/-/commit/9fae58b134d8951e15b39b8e1751160a245228a6 Nice catch! I had the exact same issue, reported here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=45788. Except for a small typo: s/subseuquent/subsequent, your fix looks good to me, and could by applied mainline I think. Thanks, Mathieu