From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#12827: [2.0.6] web client: fails to parse 404 header Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:10:24 +0100 Message-ID: <878v9rc9zz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r4o5kuy8.fsf@gnu.org> <87d2znc0u2.fsf@gnu.org> <87ip8wezdd.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353769898 7047 80.91.229.3 (24 Nov 2012 15:11:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 15:11:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12827@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Hartwig Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 24 16:11:49 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TcHOT-0007gd-2Y for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:11:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47893 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcHOI-0002Nr-A6 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:11:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36483) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcHOF-0002Nb-IU for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:11:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcHOE-0006RW-HZ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:11:31 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcHOE-0006RS-E8 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:11:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TcHPi-00062s-6Q for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 15:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12827 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12827-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12827.135376992423168 (code B ref 12827); Sat, 24 Nov 2012 15:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12827) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2012 15:12:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36758 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TcHOk-00061c-MI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: from xanadu.aquilenet.fr ([88.191.123.111]:49682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TcHOi-000619-82 for 12827@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:12:01 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xanadu.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB5D2BB7; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:10:25 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from xanadu.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xanadu.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H77Ic2GoGJ09; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:10:25 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from pluto (reverse-83.fdn.fr [80.67.176.83]) by xanadu.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F214D28A; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:10:24 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 4 Frimaire an 221 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Daniel Hartwig's message of "Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:23:04 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6591 Archived-At: Hi Daniel, Daniel Hartwig skribis: > On 24 November 2012 06:19, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Any update on that? The plan is to release 2.0.7 next week, so it=E2=80= =99d be >> great if this could be in. > > I have made a first attempt at the doc strings and manual. This > involved first syncronizing the two, as only the manual had been > receiving updates. > > Some more tweaking to the code. Thanks. I applied the first two patches, and passed the source files through: sed -e"s/@var{\([a-z0-9?!-]\+\)}/\U\1/g ; s/@code{\([^}]\+\)}/=E2=80=98\1= =E2=80=99/g" because docstrings should not contain Texinfo markup. > Personally I am not 100% on this, but I attach it for comment anyway. > I will not be able to work on it again for a short while. > > A quick solution may be to silently introduce just enough to fix the > current bug, and worry about the extra predicates, uri-record-type vs. > rfc-definition-of-uri, etc. later. I could come up with a =E2=80=98declare-relative-uri-header!=E2=80=99 that = would use (build-uri xxx #:validate? #f) as a quick fix. However, it seems to me that your patch is actually fine, and doesn=E2=80= =99t break compatibility, so I=E2=80=99d rather apply it directly. Did you have other concerns? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.