From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: No declaration for isblank Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:06:50 +0100 Message-ID: <877ileylfp.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87r6kuz6sz.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87wsulokn8.fsf@laas.fr> <87r6jo188q.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87d4v817ut.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87bqasjfus.fsf@chbouib.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193148468 4248 80.91.229.12 (23 Oct 2007 14:07:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 23 16:07:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IkKPb-0000bQ-J1 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:07:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkKPP-0005RZ-IY for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IkKPM-0005RT-MI for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:07:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IkKPL-0005Qk-3e for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:07:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkKPL-0005Qb-0e for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:06:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IkKPF-0002Qh-7D; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:06:53 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-145-152-23.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.152.23]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA33B1F68E4; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:06:51 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from laruns (unknown [192.168.0.10]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6043038009; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:06:51 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87bqasjfus.fsf@chbouib.org> (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?s's?= message of "Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:51:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3645 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > My `gl_EARLY' does require `AC_GNU_SOURCE'. I'm using: > > $ gnulib-tool --version > /usr/bin/gnulib-tool (GNU gnulib) 2007-07-01 > > This is from Debian unstable. > > (I couldn't find in Gnulib's Git log whether `AC_GNU_SOURCE' appeared in > between both versions.) Upgrading gnulib to unstable didn't help. The problem was lines like the following in /usr/bin/gnulib-tool. if grep AC_GNU_SOURCE "$destdir"/$m4base/*.m4 >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; t= hen echo " AC_REQUIRE([AC_GNU_SOURCE])" So, if you create a file m4/workaround.m4, containing just "AC_GNU_SOURCE", and then rerun autogen.sh, you get a definition of gl_EARLY that includes AC_GNU_SOURCE, and the _GNU_SOURCE stuff in config.h.in. That seems excessively magic to me, but I suppose we could ensure correct future behaviour by checking in such a file to CVS. What do you think? Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile