From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#14035: Fixed in 2.0.7 Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:48:06 -0400 Message-ID: <87620hd0vd.fsf@tines.lan> References: <8629.90.244.59.36.1363954504.squirrel@lavabit.com> <47303.90.244.59.36.1364047018.squirrel@lavabit.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364089747 31113 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2013 01:49:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14035-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: johnanthony@lavabit.com Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 24 02:49:29 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UJa3r-0005bd-Fc for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 02:49:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35508 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJa3T-0005Tp-Og for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:49:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48701) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJa3P-0005Tb-MO for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:49:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJa3O-0005KF-64 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:48:59 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38582) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJa3O-0005K3-34 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJa5O-0004T5-7Q for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:51:02 -0400 Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 14035 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 14035@debbugs.gnu.org, mhw@netris.org, johnanthony@lavabit.com Original-Received: via spool by 14035-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D14035.136408983617138 (code D ref 14035); Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14035-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2013 01:50:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42691 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJa4y-0004SN-4c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:50:36 -0400 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:44831) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJa4n-0004S7-6k for 14035-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:50:35 -0400 Original-Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=tines.lan) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJa2g-00067y-5z; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:48:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47303.90.244.59.36.1364047018.squirrel@lavabit.com> (johnanthony@lavabit.com's message of "Sat, 23 Mar 2013 09:56:58 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:7002 Archived-At: Hi John, johnanthony@lavabit.com writes: > I grabbed 2.0.7 to see if it was fixed here and it appears to be. Excellent, thanks for letting us know! > Apologies if I was re-reporting an existing bug that was both known about > and fixed. No need to apologize. Thanks for taking the time to file this report, and for following up :) Regards, Mark