From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#20655: According to docs non-greedy regexp should work in guile but they don't Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 22:41:47 +0200 Message-ID: <8760szljsk.fsf@pobox.com> References: <3731893.AiLGfpWM9Y@hamiller> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466714549 14626 80.91.229.3 (23 Jun 2016 20:42:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20655-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Gerdau Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 23 22:42:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bGBS3-0003JG-Iy for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 22:42:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39266 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGBS2-00012b-9Q for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:42:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGBRw-00011E-45 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:42:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGBRq-0001Sq-Ik for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:42:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGBRq-0001Si-EJ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGBRq-0006E9-9z for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:42:02 -0400 Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 20655 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 20655@debbugs.gnu.org, wingo@pobox.com, mgd@qata.de Original-Received: via spool by 20655-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D20655.146671451823921 (code D ref 20655); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20655-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2016 20:41:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53047 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGBRm-0006Dl-CE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:41:58 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.67]:65091 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGBRl-0006De-1u for 20655-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:41:57 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD638249C8; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:41:55 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=1kONpy1X1NUBY530AhW9H01wUlM=; b=jHxdgh gh4XcsHMqtSZJxINfDb6pZAAben5LhPebDBKRemXcKeOslK8serpf3wcmh2g5N5i j6W/dLphoCWn/QTlE3iLKKpSDHuiwtO2a/33n5RmTh/6193dJdRI8yQOnd0/Q09u Vn/Dg27oYMt3BbYDK8MOevpVIsdDkXnl8WZYU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Eaea47KDN2FUTtCqdBuYetSauC4n/4ed ZzIYX1Z0NCQ5SVoNNU5xvnyF6V9yJDx46pCAxNF3g8VR3cUhA9SwAd+wyxWCgpSL ovojGULqj+T+7vXqNqY1tyVYtvDXL+Yz/xDLcBW0dpsbXe4IH3gmNt5puq/UHV0O 8XFuyXKnrXQ= Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6176249C6; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:41:55 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC3DB249C5; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:41:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <3731893.AiLGfpWM9Y@hamiller> (Michael Gerdau's message of "Mon, 25 May 2015 23:58:53 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EC2EA424-3982-11E6-BDC1-28A6F1301B6D-02397024!pb-sasl2.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8188 Archived-At: On Mon 25 May 2015 23:58, Michael Gerdau writes: > the guile documentation under > https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Regular-Expressions.html#index-regular-expressions > directly references Regular expressions used in Emacs which do > support non-greedy regexp. > > However in the archive of the guile-devel ML I found a thread that seems > to indicate that guile simply does not support non-greedy regexp, which > is perfectly in line with my findings (see below). > > AFAICT this is either misleading if not an outright documentation bug, > or a missing feature in guile. A documentation bug indeed. Fixed in git by Diogo Ramos. Thanks for the report, Andy