From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#13031: large numbers Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:06:41 -0500 Message-ID: <874njxbxlq.fsf@tines.lan> References: <7B53D3D8-EDFE-47B5-93C1-FD52B21A3F39@applicake.com> <87obieuz1a.fsf@tines.lan> <87ip8ivflv.fsf@tines.lan> <87a9tsv5ba.fsf@tines.lan> <9551F2D5-057A-48C8-B124-561FEF9CBB0E@applicake.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354900073 25557 80.91.229.3 (7 Dec 2012 17:07:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 17:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13031-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jozef Chraplewski Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 07 18:08:04 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Th1PA-0002st-3X for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:08:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38243 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th1Ox-0002UR-Rl for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:07:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th1Or-0002Sw-5K for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:07:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th1Oo-0007L6-UB for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:07:45 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th1Oo-0007Ky-Ro for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:07:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Th1P8-0007Kj-3g for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:08:02 -0500 Resent-From: Mark H Weaver Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 13031 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 13031@debbugs.gnu.org, mhw@netris.org, jozef@applicake.com Original-Received: via spool by 13031-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D13031.135490003728139 (code D ref 13031); Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13031-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2012 17:07:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59169 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Th1OP-0007Jo-DI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:07:17 -0500 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:40565) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Th1ON-0007Jg-PB for 13031-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:07:16 -0500 Original-Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=tines.lan) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Th1Ny-0003RI-A3; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:06:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <9551F2D5-057A-48C8-B124-561FEF9CBB0E@applicake.com> (Jozef Chraplewski's message of "Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:40:16 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6653 Archived-At: Hi Jozef, Jozef Chraplewski writes: > Yes, I use 64-bit machine and (* (expt 2 32) (expt 2 32)) produces 0 (without the patch). > > I've applied your fix and it works perfectly. Excellent! Thanks for bringing this problem to our attention, and for helping us track it down :) > I suppose that you will add the patch to the next stable version (2.0.8 ??) Yes. Thanks again, Mark